Measuring the spatial price differences in China with regional price parity methods

被引:8
作者
Chen, Menggen [1 ]
Wang, Yan [2 ]
Rao, D. S. Prasada [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Econ & Social Dev, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
aggregation; basket products; CPD model; regional price parities; spatial deflation; PURCHASING-POWER; INDEXES; COST; INEQUALITY; QUALITY; INCOME; GROWTH; TIME; BIAS; LAW;
D O I
10.1111/twec.12899
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The measurement of prices has been an important field in economics, and a spatial price index is very useful in comparing the standards of living and well-being across regions in a country. This paper intends to measure the regional price parities (RPPs) across different provincial areas in China with an urban sample of 140 goods and services in 2015 according to the framework of the International Comparison Program (ICP) methodology. The results show that the RPPs that were estimated with commonly used approaches, such as the Gini-elteto-Koves-Szulc (GEKS), Geary-Khamis (GK) and weighted country product dummy (WCPD), are only slightly different. The RPPs of three regions including Guangdong, Shanghai and Zhejiang are greater than 1 (with Beijing = 1), while the other 27 regions are all lower than 1, which represents price levels that are less than Beijing. In the extrapolation of the RPPs from 2000 to 2014, a significant descending trend is found for the standard deviation series of the RPPs over time that shows that the price differences across regions decreased during the extrapolating period. This finding provides evidence of a phenomenon of spatial price converging in China. Finally, a study on the deflation of provincial aggregates with the RPPs reveals that the spatial price adjustment will change the ranks or relative importance of different regions in the country. Especially, the measurement of income inequality proves that the Gini coefficients of provincial income deflated by the RPPGEKS are all lower than the Gini coefficients of unadjusted incomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1146
页数:44
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The cost of a growth miracle - reassessing price and poverty trends in China [J].
Almas, Ingvild ;
Johnsen, Ashild Auglaend .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2018, 30 :239-264
[2]   International Income Inequality: Measuring PPP Bias by Estimating Engel Curves for Food [J].
Almas, Ingvild .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (02) :1093-1117
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RES STUD POV PURCH P
[4]  
[Anonymous], IARIW 33 GEN C ROTT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CHINA US BUSINESS RE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 1321 PRINC U W WILS
[7]  
Aten B. H., 2010, 31 GEN C IARIW 27 AU
[8]  
Aten BH, 2006, MON LABOR REV, V129, P47
[9]  
Aten BettinaH., 2012, Survey of Current Business, V92, P229
[10]   THE PURCHASING-POWER PARITY DOCTRINE - A REAPPRAISAL [J].
BALASSA, B .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1964, 72 (06) :584-596