Trends in Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Norway

被引:141
作者
Baghestan, Elham [1 ]
Irgens, Lorentz M.
Bordahl, Per E.
Rasmussen, Svein
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
关键词
MEDICAL BIRTH REGISTRY; TEARS; EPISIOTOMY; INCONTINENCE; 3RD-DEGREE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e2f50b
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a large population-based data set, and to assess to what extent changes in these risk factors could account for trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study on data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway between 1967 and 2004, including all vaginal singleton deliveries of vertex-presenting fetuses weighing 500 g or more. Women with their first birth before 1967 and births with previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries were excluded, leaving 1,673,442 births for study. The outcome variable was third- and fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries. The associations of obstetric anal sphincter injuries with possible risk factors were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) obtained by logistic regression. RESULTS: The occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries increased from 0.5% in 1967 to 4.1% in 2004. After adjusting for demographic and other risk factors, as well as possible confounders, the increase of obstetric anal sphincter injuries persisted, although reduced (un-adjusted OR 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-7.4; adjusted OR 5.6; 95% CI 5.3-5.9). Obstetric anal sphincter injuries were significantly associated with maternal age 30 years or older, vaginal birth order of one, previous cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, episiotomy, type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, induction of labor by prostaglandin, size of maternity unit, birth weight 3,500 g or more, head circumference 35 cm or more, and African or Asian country of birth. CONCLUSION: Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries considerably increased in Norway in 1967 to 2004. Changes in the risk factors studied could only partially explain this increase. (Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:25-33)
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: A prospective study
    Andrews, V
    Sultan, AH
    Thakar, R
    Jones, PW
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2006, 33 (02): : 117 - 122
  • [2] Occult anal sphincter injuries - myth or reality?
    Andrews, V
    Sultan, AH
    Thakar, R
    Jones, PW
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [3] A validation of the diagnosis of obstetric sphincter tears in two Norwegian databases, the Medical Birth Registry and the Patient Administration System
    Baghestan, Elham
    Bordahl, Per E.
    Rasmussen, Svein A.
    Sande, Anne K.
    Lyslo, Ingvill
    Solvang, Isabel
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (02) : 205 - 209
  • [4] Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery
    Christianson, LM
    Bovbjerg, VE
    McDavitt, EC
    Hullfish, KL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (01) : 255 - 260
  • [5] RISK-FACTORS FOR 3RD-DEGREE AND 4TH-DEGREE PERINEAL LACERATIONS IN FORCEPS AND VACUUM DELIVERIES
    COMBS, CA
    ROBERTSON, PA
    LAROS, RK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) : 100 - 104
  • [6] Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    de Wit, C.
    Kuijken, J. P. J. A.
    Bruinse, H. W.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [7] Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery
    de Leeuw, JW
    Struijk, PC
    Vierhout, ME
    Wallenburg, HCS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (04): : 383 - 387
  • [8] Increasing incidence of anal sphincter tears among primiparas in Sweden:: A population-based register study
    Ekeus, Cecilia
    Nilsson, Emma
    Gottvall, Karin
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 87 (05) : 564 - 573
  • [9] Elchalal U, 1997, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V52, P643, DOI 10.1097/00006254-199710000-00022
  • [10] Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?
    Eogan, M
    Daly, L
    O'Connell, PR
    O'Herlihy, C
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (02) : 190 - 194