Attention guidance augmentation of virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:21
作者
Rubin, Mikael [1 ]
Muller, Karl [2 ]
Hayhoe, Mary M. [2 ]
Telch, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, 108 E Dean Keeton, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Perceptual Syst, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Virtual reality; social anxiety; exposure therapy; attention; BIAS MODIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE; AVOIDANCE; PHOBIA; SPEECH; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/16506073.2022.2053882
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Biased attention to social threats has been implicated in social anxiety disorder. Modifying visual attention during exposure therapy offers a direct test of this mechanism. We developed and tested a brief virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) protocol using 360 degrees-video and eye tracking. Participants (N = 21) were randomized to either standard VRET or VRET + attention guidance training (AGT). Multilevel Bayesian models were used to test (1) whether there was an effect of condition over time and (2) whether post-treatment changes in gaze patterns mediated the effect of condition at follow-up. There was a large overall effect of the intervention on symptoms of social anxiety, as well as an effect of the AGT augmentation on changes in visual attention to audience members. There was weak evidence against an effect of condition on fear of public speaking and weak evidence supporting a mediation effect, however these estimates were strongly influenced by model priors. Taken together, our findings suggest that attention can be modified within and during VRET and that modification of visual gaze avoidance may be casually linked to reductions in social anxiety. Replication with a larger sample size is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 387
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   A Meta-Analysis of Bias at Baseline in RCTs of Attention Bias Modification: No Evidence for Dot-Probe Bias Towards Threat in Clinical Anxiety and PTSD [J].
Kruijt, Anne-Wil ;
Parsons, Sam ;
Fox, Elaine .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 128 (06) :563-573
[22]  
Kurz A.S., 2021, EFFECT SIZES EXPT TR
[23]   Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments [J].
Li, Chia-Ling ;
Pilar Aivar, M. ;
Kit, Dmitry M. ;
Tong, Matthew H. ;
Hayhoe, Mary M. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2016, 16 (08)
[24]  
Liebowitz M R, 1987, Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry, V22, P141
[25]   Conflicts in Bayesian Statistics Between Inference Based on Credible Intervals and Bayes Factors [J].
Lovric, Miodrag M. .
JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2019, 18 (01)
[26]  
MCCROSKEY JC, 1970, SPEECH MONOGR, V37, P269
[27]   Mediators in psychological and psychoeducational interventions for the prevention of depression and anxiety. A systematic review [J].
Moreno-Peral, Patricia ;
Angel Bellon, Juan ;
Huibers, Marcus J. H. ;
Mestre, Jose M. ;
Joaquin Garcia-Lopez, Luis ;
Taubner, Svenja ;
Rodriguez-Morejon, Alberto ;
Bolinski, Felix ;
Sales, Calia M. D. ;
Conejo-Ceron, Sonia .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 76
[28]   Affect labeling enhances exposure effectiveness for public speaking anxiety [J].
Niles, Andrea N. ;
Craske, Michelle G. ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. ;
Hur, Christopher .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2015, 68 :27-36
[29]   The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial Validity and Internal Consistency Findings From Three Multisite Studies With Adolescents and Adults [J].
Posner, Kelly ;
Brown, Gregory K. ;
Stanley, Barbara ;
Brent, David A. ;
Yershova, Kseniya V. ;
Oquendo, Maria A. ;
Currier, Glenn W. ;
Melvin, Glenn A. ;
Greenhill, Laurence ;
Shen, Sa ;
Mann, J. John .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 168 (12) :1266-1277
[30]   Effect Size Measures for Mediation Models: Quantitative Strategies for Communicating Indirect Effects [J].
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Kelley, Ken .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (02) :93-115