Network Canvas: Key decisions in the design of an interviewer-assisted network data collection software suite

被引:32
作者
Birkett, M. [1 ]
Melville, J. [1 ]
Janulis, P. [1 ]
Phillips, G., II [1 ]
Contractor, N. [2 ]
Hogan, B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med Social Sci, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Dept Management & Org, Evanston, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, Oxford, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Networks; Data collection; Software; Social networks;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2021.02.003
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Self-reported social network analysis studies are often complex and burdensome, both during the interview process itself, and when conducting data management following the interview. Through funding obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA/NIH), our team developed the Network Canvas suite of software - a set of complementary tools that are designed to simplify the collection and storage of complex social network data, with an emphasis on usability and accessibility across platforms and devices, and guided by the practical needs of researchers. The suite consists of three applications: Architect: an application for researchers to design and export interview protocols; Interviewer: a touch-optimized application for loading and administering interview protocols to study participants; and Server: an application for researchers to manage the interview deployment process and export their data for analysis. Together, they enable researchers with minimal technological expertise to access a complete research workflow, by building their own network interview protocols, deploying these protocols widely within a variety of contexts, and immediately attaining the resulting data from a secure central location. In this paper, we outline the critical decisions taken in developing this suite of tools for the network research community. We also describe the work which guides our decision-making, including prior experiences and key discovery events. We focus on key design choices, taken for theoretical, philosophical, and pragmatic reasons, and outline their strengths and limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 124
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
adams j., 2019, Gathering Social Network Data
[2]  
ANAMIA Egocenter, 2013, EC HAUT ET SCI SOC E
[3]  
Antonucci T.C., 1986, Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, V10, P10
[4]   Participatory action research [J].
Baum, Fran ;
MacDougall, Colin ;
Smith, Danielle .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (10) :854-857
[5]   Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: an egocentric approach [J].
Carrasco, Juan Antonio ;
Hogan, Bernie ;
Wellman, Barry ;
Miller, Eric J. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2008, 35 (06) :961-980
[6]  
Crossley N., 2015, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[7]  
Dubois E, 2015, INT J COMMUN-US, V9, P2067
[8]   Comparing nascent approaches for gathering alter-tie data for egocentric studies [J].
Eddens, Kate ;
Fagan, Jesse M. .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2018, 55 :130-141
[9]  
Edwards Gemma., 2010, Mixed-Method Approaches to Social Network Analysis
[10]  
Freeman L.C., 2000, J SOC STRUCT, V1