Early Auditory Evoked Potential Is Modulated by Selective Attention and Related to Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity

被引:37
|
作者
Giuliano, Ryan J. [1 ]
Karns, Christina M. [1 ]
Neville, Helen J. [1 ]
Hillyard, Steven A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; BRAIN POTENTIALS; COMPONENT; CHILDREN; FEATURES; STORAGE; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_00684
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A growing body of research suggests that the predictive power of working memory (WM) capacity for measures of intellectual aptitude is due to the ability to control attention and select relevant information. Crucially, attentional mechanisms implicated in controlling access to WM are assumed to be domain-general, yet reports of enhanced attentional abilities in individuals with larger WM capacities are primarily within the visual domain. Here, we directly test the link between WM capacity and early attentional gating across sensory domains, hypothesizing that measures of visual WM capacity should predict an individual's capacity to allocate auditory selective attention. To address this question, auditory ERPs were recorded in a linguistic dichotic listening task, and individual differences in ERP modulations by attention were correlated with estimates of WM capacity obtained in a separate visual change detection task. Auditory selective attention enhanced ERP amplitudes at an early latency (ca. 70-90 msec), with larger P1 components elicited by linguistic probes embedded in an attended narrative. Moreover, this effect was associated with greater individual estimates of visual WM capacity. These findings support the view that domain-general attentional control mechanisms underlie the wide variation of WM capacity across individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:2682 / 2690
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Many Facets of Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity
    Unsworth, Nash
    PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, VOL 65, 2016, 65 : 1 - 46
  • [22] A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control
    Unsworth, Nash
    Robison, Matthew K.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2017, 24 (04) : 1282 - 1311
  • [23] Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
    Ye, Chaoxiong
    Xu, Qianru
    Liu, Xinyang
    Astikainen, Piia
    Zhu, Yongjie
    Hu, Zhonghua
    Liu, Qiang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [24] Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Infant Visual Attention and Recognition Memory
    Reynolds, Greg D.
    Guy, Maggie W.
    Zhang, Dantong
    INFANCY, 2011, 16 (04) : 368 - 391
  • [25] Individual visual working memory capacities and related brain oscillatory activities are modulated by color preferences
    Kawasaki, Masahiro
    Yamaguchi, Yako
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [26] Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors
    Allon, Ayala S.
    Luria, Roy
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (05)
  • [27] Auditory selective attention in adolescents with major depression: An event-related potential study
    Greimel, E.
    Trinkl, M.
    Bartling, J.
    Bakos, S.
    Grossheinrich, N.
    Schulte-Koerne, G.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 172 : 445 - 452
  • [28] Steady-state visual evoked potential and its applications in studying visual selective attention
    Chen, Xiaoyu
    Cheng, Zijian
    Hu, Chengmi
    Liang, Tengfei
    Liu, Qiang
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE, 2020, 65 (24): : 2601 - 2614
  • [29] The temporal dynamics of visual working memory guidance of selective attention
    Tan, Jinfeng
    Zhao, Yuanfang
    Wu, Shanshan
    Wang, Lijun
    Hitchman, Glenn
    Tian, Xia
    Li, Ming
    Hu, Li
    Chen, Antao
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [30] Flexible attention allocation to visual and auditory working memory tasks: manipulating reward induces a trade-off
    Morey, Candice Coker
    Cowan, Nelson
    Morey, Richard D.
    Rouder, Jeffery N.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (02) : 458 - 472