Beam-column method for tieback walls

被引:22
作者
Briaud, JL [1 ]
Kim, NK
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Geotest Engn Inc, Houston, TX 77036 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:1(67)
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The beam-column method for the design of tieback walls is of intermediate complexity between the pressure diagram methods and the finite-element method (FEM). A set of recommended P-y, F-w, and Q-w curves are presented for the soil model and the P-y path method is described to simulate properly the construction sequence of excavation and tieback stressing. The recommended beam-column method is evaluated by comparing predictions with the measured behavior of four full-scale tieback walls in sand and in clay. The most influencing factors are identified through a parametric analysis and a comparison with four pressure diagram methods is presented. The beam-column method is a deflection-based method that satisfies the vertical, horizontal, and moment equilibrium of the wall. These significant and fundamental advantages over the pressure diagram methods make it a superior method, which should be used anytime the added complexity is warranted. The most severe limitation of the beam-column method is its inability to properly account for mass phenomena, namely, mass movement and downdrag. The most useful aspect of the beam-column method is its ability to give better bending moment profiles than the pressure diagram methods.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 79
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AM PETR I, 1984, AM PETR I REC PRACT
[2]  
BRIAUD JL, 1996, 393 NCHRP TEX A M U
[3]  
BRIAUD JL, 1998, J GEOTECH GEOENVIR E, V124
[4]  
Canadian Geotechnical Society (CGS), 1985, CAN FDN ENG MAN CFEM
[5]  
CHENEY RS, 1988, FHWADP681R
[6]  
Chung M., 1993, BEHAV FULL SCALE TIE
[7]  
CLOUGH WG, 1974, P J GEOTECH DIV ASCE, V12, P1259
[8]  
CLOUGH WG, 1984, USERS MANUAL PROGRAM
[9]  
Coulomb C. A., 1776, MEM ACAD ROY DES SCI, V3, P38
[10]  
HALIBURTON TA, 1968, P ASCE, V94, P1233