Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications

被引:54
作者
Childress, NL
Salehpour, M
Dong, L
Bloch, C
White, RA
Rosen, II
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
film dosimetry; IMRT treatment plan verification; quality assurance; radiation therapy;
D O I
10.1118/1.1852791
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite(R) phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to 300 cGy. 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of 240 MU or 360 MU and using 6 MV or 18 MV energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%-15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film's 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2's intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single 300 MU exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film 1 MU, 2 MU, and 4 MU at a time to a total of 300 MU. An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film's OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and 18 MV beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film's OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and 2 rum criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within 5%/2 mm criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times. (C) 2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 548
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Arnfield M R, 2001, Med Dosim, V26, P179, DOI 10.1016/S0958-3947(01)00058-9
[2]   Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry [J].
Bucciolini, M ;
Buonamici, FB ;
Casati, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (01) :161-168
[3]   A new approach to film dosimetry for high energy photon beams: Lateral scatter filtering [J].
Burch, SE ;
Kearfott, KJ ;
Trueblood, JH ;
Sheils, WC ;
Yeo, JI ;
Wang, CKC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (05) :775-783
[4]  
Chang J, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P287, DOI 10.1120/1.1615071
[5]  
Charland Paule M, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P25, DOI 10.1120/1.1522990
[6]   Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry [J].
Chetty, IJ ;
Charland, PM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) :3629-3641
[7]   Effect of processing time delay on the dose response of Kodak EDR2 film [J].
Childress, NL ;
Rosen, II .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (08) :2284-2288
[8]   The design and testing of novel clinical parameters for dose comparison [J].
Childress, NL ;
Rosen, II .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1464-1479
[9]   Rapid radiographic film calibration for IMRT verification using automated MLC fields [J].
Childress, NL ;
Dong, L ;
Rosen, II .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (10) :2384-2390
[10]   Surface and build-up region dosimetry for obliquely incident intensity modulated radiotherapy 6 MV x rays [J].
Dogan, N ;
Glasgow, GP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (12) :3091-3096