Sedation and Analgesia for Cardiac Catheterisation and Coronary Intervention

被引:10
作者
Whitehead, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Clark, Alison L. [2 ]
Williams, Trent D. [1 ,4 ]
Collins, Nicholas J. [1 ,4 ]
Boyle, Andrew J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Locked Bag 1, Newcastle, NSW 2310, Australia
[2] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
Sedation; Cardiac catheterisation; Analgesia; Coronary angiography; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; INTRAVENOUS SEDATION; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; TASK-FORCE; PREMEDICATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANESTHESIA; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ASSOCIATION; REPERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2019.08.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background While cardiac catheterisation is typically well tolerated, discomfort and anxiety are commonplace. Sedation using anxiolytic and analgesic medications has the potential to ameliorate such symptoms, however, is variably employed, with lack of standardised regimens and limited evidence. Methods We performed a review of the role of sedation for cardiac catheterisation, including current practices and summarising available evidence relevant to diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Results Use of sedation and the medication regimens employed are highly variable. Available relevant studies are limited in number and mostly small. Sedation appears to modestly reduce anxiety and pain in most studies. The incidence of radial spasm and the consequent need to alter access site is reduced with procedural sedation. The majority of existing evidence applies to benzodiazepines and opioid use, which appear acceptably efficacious and safe when used with appropriate training and staffing; noting opioid medications reduce the absorption of loading doses of oral anti-platelet drugs. Conclusions In conclusion, benzodiazepines and opioids result a modest reduction in pain, improved patient tolerability and reduced risk of radial artery spasm. The decision on whether to use sedation, and which agent(s) and dose, should be individualised based on patient factors, including need for oral antiplatelet therapy administration. Appropriate staffing and monitoring is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Diazepam versus Fentanyl for Premedication during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from the Myocardial Protection by Fentanyl during Coronary Intervention (PROFIT) Trial
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Khattab, Ahmed A.
    Liska, Branislav
    Kassner, Guido
    Geist, Volker
    Toelg, Ralph
    Richardt, Gert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 21 (03) : 232 - 238
  • [2] Al Rifai MS, 2017, CIRCULATION, V136
  • [3] Do We Need Premedication Before Coronary Angiography? A Controlled Clinical Trial
    Alamri, Hussein
    Almoghairi, Abdulrahman
    Almasood, Ali
    Alotaibi, Mohamed
    Alonazi, Sami
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 2 (05) : 224 - 228
  • [4] American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2016, STAT GRANT PRIV ADM
  • [5] Effect of local anesthesia and intravenous sedation on pain perception and vasovagal reactions during femoral arterial sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ang, Choon Kiat
    Leung, Dominic Y. C.
    Lo, Sidney
    French, John K.
    Juergens, Craig P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 116 (03) : 321 - 326
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2015, STAND BAS AN MON
  • [7] Ashraf JM, 2015, J GERIATR CARDIOL, V12, P257, DOI 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.03.017
  • [8] Astarcioglu MA, 2016, HERZ, V41, P435, DOI 10.1007/s00059-015-4373-5
  • [9] Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, 2017, GUID MON AN PS18
  • [10] Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, 2014, GUID SED AND OR AN D