Soil Microbial Community Composition in a Peach Orchard Under Different Irrigation Methods and Postharvest Deficit Irrigation

被引:9
作者
Dangi, Sadikshya Rana [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Huihui [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
Gerik, James [1 ]
Hanson, Bradley D. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Water Management Res Unit, San Joaquin Valley Agr Sci Ctr, USDA, 9611 S Riverbend Ave, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] ARS, Water Management Res, USDA, Ft Collins, CO USA
关键词
Deficit irrigation; drip; furrow; microbial community biomass; microsprinkler; WATER AVAILABILITY; DRIP IRRIGATION; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS; QUALITY; GROWTH; TREES; FRUIT; PLANT;
D O I
10.1097/SS.0000000000000153
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The San Joaquin Valley produces more than 250 unique crops and much of the U.S. fruits, vegetables, and nuts. One of the main limiting factors for production in this region is reduced availability of water. Deficit irrigation is a management practice where plants receive less than full irrigation but only at certain growth stages to minimize yield loss or long-term impacts to the crop. Given the multiple roles of soil microorganisms in the soil system, it is important to asses any impact of deficit irrigation on soil microbial communities. In the present study, full and deficit irrigation treatments were applied for 7 years using furrow, microsprinkler, and surface drip irrigation systems in a peach orchard. In the seventh year, soil samples were collected before and after implementation of deficit irrigation treatments to investigate effects on soil microbial community biomass and composition. Results showed that the proportion of Gram-positive bacteria and actinomycetes were significantly higher in furrow irrigation, whereas fungi and Gram-negative bacteria were lower in proportion under furrow irrigation as compared with microsprinkler and drip irrigation methods. Canonical variate analysis showed that soil microbial communities markedly differed after deficit treatment in furrow and microspray irrigation, but remained similar in surface drip irrigation in deficit and full irrigation. This may be due to frequent irrigation in surface drip where soil surface remained moist most of the time as compared with furrow and microsprinkler irrigation methods where irrigation was less frequent.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 215
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Performance evaluation of drip irrigation and fertigation system for sweet maize and telfairia occidentalis [J].
Afolayan, S. O. ;
Ewemoje, T. A. ;
Lateef, S. A. ;
Ajayi, E. .
ADVANCES IN MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, 18-19 :177-+
[2]   Soil water variability under subsurface drip and furrow irrigation [J].
Amali, S ;
Rolston, DE ;
Fulton, AE ;
Hanson, BR ;
Phene, CJ ;
Oster, JD .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 1997, 17 (04) :151-155
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB ENV PHYSL FRUIT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SAS STAT US GUID VER
[5]   Soil microbial communities associated with Bt and non-Bt corn in three soils [J].
Blackwood, CB ;
Buyer, JS .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2004, 33 (03) :832-836
[6]   Effect of water regime on productivity and quality of fruit and wine [J].
Bravdo, B ;
Naor, A .
FIRST ISHS WORKSHOP ON STRATEGIES TO OPTIMIZE WINE GRAPE QUALITY, 1996, (427) :15-26
[7]   Influence of irrigation method and scheduling on patterns of soil and tree water status and its relation to yield and fruit quality in peach [J].
Bryla, DR ;
Dickson, E ;
Shenk, R ;
Johnson, RS ;
Crisosto, CH ;
Trout, TJ .
HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (07) :2118-2124
[8]   Growth and production of young peach trees irrigated by furrow, microjet, surface drip, or subsurface drip systems [J].
Bryla, DR ;
Trout, TJ ;
Ayars, JE ;
Johnson, RS .
HORTSCIENCE, 2003, 38 (06) :1112-1116
[9]   High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils [J].
Buyer, Jeffrey S. ;
Sasser, Myron .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2012, 61 :127-130
[10]   Factors affecting soil microbial community structure in tomato cropping systems [J].
Buyer, Jeffrey S. ;
Teasdale, John R. ;
Roberts, Daniel P. ;
Zasada, Inga A. ;
Maul, Jude E. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 42 (05) :831-841