Analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors

被引:210
作者
Biswas, Baidyanath [1 ]
Gupta, Rohit [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Management Inst, Informat Technol Area, 2-4 C,Judges Ct Rd, Kolkata 700027, India
[2] Inst Management Technol, Operat & Supply Chain Management Area, Ghaziabad 201001, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Blockchains; Digital ledger technology; DEMATEL; Barrier analysis; Causal relationships; DECISION-MAKING TRIAL; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; DEMATEL ANALYSIS; THRESHOLD VALUE; BITCOIN; MODEL; TECHNOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION; SELECTION; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology holds immense potential for industries and services by executing transactions in a verifiable and permanent way. It operates as an open distributed ledger that can record transactions between two parties. However, the adoption and implementation of blockchain technologies in various industries and services is a challenging task. In this study, we develop a framework for investigating barriers to the adoption and successful implementation of blockchains across different industries and services, using DEMATEL technique. We identify these barriers with the help of extant literature and experts' opinions and further classify them into ten broad categories. Then, we establish the causal relationships among those barriers and rank them based on their degree of prominence and relationships. We find that challenges in scalability and market-based risks are the most influencing barriers. Whereas high sustainability costs and poor economic behavior are the most influenced barriers during successful blockchain adoption. Finally, we perform a series of sensitivity analysis to test the robustness and generalizability of our proposed framework. Findings from our study will be beneficial for managers and help to eliminate the major barriers in the efficient implementation of blockchain technologies in their organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 241
页数:17
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Abramova S., 2016, Perceived benefit and risk as multidimensional determinants of bitcoin use: A quantitative exploratory study
[2]  
Androulaki E., 2013, LNCS, V7859, P34, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1, 10.1007/978-3-642-39884-14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39884-14]
[3]   On the Malleability of Bitcoin Transactions [J].
Andrychowicz, Marcin ;
Dziembowski, Stefan ;
Malinowski, Daniel ;
Mazurek, Lukasz .
FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY (FC 2015), 2015, 8976 :1-18
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P 2013 ECRIME RES SU, DOI DOI 10.1109/ECRS.2013.6805780
[5]  
[Anonymous], CORR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TELEGRAPH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The New York Times
[8]  
[Anonymous], CORR
[9]   Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on Cryptocurrencies [J].
Apostolaki, Maria ;
Zohar, Aviv ;
Vanbever, Laurent .
2017 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP), 2017, :375-392
[10]  
Atkins B., 2014, Pittsburgh Tax Review, V12, P25, DOI DOI 10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2014.32