The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities

被引:191
作者
Butterworth, P [1 ]
Crosier, T
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Mental Hlth Res Ctr, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Dept Family & Community Serv, Strateg Policy & Knowledge Branch, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-4-44
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The SF-36 is one of the most widely used self-completion measures of health status. The inclusion of the SF-36 in the first Australian national household panel survey, the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia ( HILDA) Survey, provides an opportunity to investigate health inequalities. In this analysis we establish the psychometric properties and criterion validity of the SF-36 HILDA Survey data and examine scale profiles across a range of measures of socioeconomic circumstance. Methods: Data from 13,055 respondents who completed the first wave of the HILDA Survey were analysed to determine the psychometric properties of the SF-36 and the relationship of the SF-36 scales to other measures of health, disability, social functioning and demographic characteristics. Results: Results of principle components analysis were similar to previous Australian and international reports. Survey scales demonstrated convergent and divergent validity, and different markers of social status demonstrated unique patterns of outcomes across the scales. Conclusion: Results demonstrated the validity of the SF-36 data collected during the first wave of the HILDA Survey and support its use in research examining health inequalities and population health characteristics in Australia.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, US KESSL PSYCH DISTR
  • [2] [Anonymous], SF 36 PHYS MENT HLTH
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1992, Measuring Function and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1995, NAT HLTH SURV SF 36
  • [6] SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS - THE CAUSATION-SELECTION ISSUE
    DOHRENWEND, BP
    LEVAV, I
    SHROUT, PE
    SCHWARTZ, S
    NAVEH, G
    LINK, BG
    SKODOL, AE
    STUEVE, A
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1992, 255 (5047) : 946 - 952
  • [7] Health and unemployment
    Dooley, D
    Fielding, J
    Levi, L
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 17 : 449 - 465
  • [8] Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey
    Fukuhara, S
    Ware, JE
    Kosinski, M
    Wada, S
    Gandek, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) : 1045 - 1053
  • [9] Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA project approach
    Gandek, B
    Ware, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) : 953 - 959
  • [10] The impact of socioeconomic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire: The Whitehall II study
    Hemingway, H
    Nicholson, A
    Stafford, M
    Roberts, R
    Marmot, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (09) : 1484 - 1490