Notch Volume Measured on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Better Than 2-Dimensional Notch Parameters for Predicting Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Males

Purpose: To evaluate and compare intercondylar notch volume with other 2-dimensional notch parameters (measured on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) for prediction of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in males. Methods: Retrospective case-control study in males based on MRI images. The case group consisted of 80 noncontact ACL-injured males and a control group of 80 age- and height-matched ACL-intact males. Inclusion criteria were 18 to 50 years old, full-thickness tear, MRI obtained within 1 year of injury, and ACL tear visually documented during arthroscopy. Multiligamentous, bilateral, or concomitant bony injuries were excluded. Notch volume and 2D parameters in both planes, including notch depth, notch width, intercondylar notch angle, notch-width index, and notch-shape index, were measured on MRI and compared. Slice interval was included in the formula for notch-volume assessment. Bivariate Pearson correlation between notch volume and 2D parameters was estimated. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was used for predictor model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. Results: All MRIs had a standard slice thickness of 3 mm and slice interval of 0.3 mm. Notch volume (P < .001), notch angle in the axial plane (P = .001), and notch width in the coronal plane (P = .009) were significantly smaller in the ACL-injured group. Notch volume had inconsistent and negligible to low correlation with 2D parameters. Notch volume was the only significant contributor in the predictor model (P < .001). ROC curve showed that notch volume had highest area under the curve of 84.1% and optimal cutoff at 7.1550 cm3 (specificity, 88.7%; sensitivity, 65%). Conclusion: Significantly smaller intercondylar notch volume is associated with noncontact ACL injury in men and is the most important predictor for such an injury (optimal cutoff of 7.1550 cm3). Two-dimensional notch parameters are inconsistently associated with noncontact ACL injury in men, and none of the 2D parameters can be used as a surrogate for notch volume. Two-dimensional notch parameters fare poorly in predicting noncontact ACL injury in males. Notch volume measurement should include slice interval as a factor. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective case-control study.