Agreement Rate Initialized Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Ensemble Classifier Aggregation and Its Application in Brain-Computer Interface

被引:0
作者
Wu, Dongrui [1 ]
Lawhern, Vernon J. [2 ,3 ]
Gordon, Stephen [4 ]
Lance, Brent J. [2 ]
Lin, Chin-Teng [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] DataNova, Clifton Pk, NY 12065 USA
[2] US Army Res Lab, Human Res & Engn Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD USA
[3] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Comp Sci, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] DCS Corp, Alexandria, VA USA
[5] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Brain Res Ctr, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC) | 2016年
关键词
Brain-computer interface; classification; EEG; ensemble learning; maximum likelihood estimator;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ensemble learning is a powerful approach to construct a strong learner from multiple base learners. The most popular way to aggregate an ensemble of classifiers is majority voting, which assigns a sample to the class that most base classifiers vote for. However, improved performance can be obtained by assigning weights to the base classifiers according to their accuracy. This paper proposes an agreement rate initialized maximum likelihood estimator (ARIMLE) to optimally fuse the base classifiers. ARIMLE first uses a simplified agreement rate method to estimate the classification accuracy of each base classifier from the unlabeled samples, then employs the accuracies to initialize a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), and finally uses the expectation-maximization algorithm to refine the MLE. Extensive experiments on visually evoked potential classification in a brain-computer interface application show that ARIMLE outperforms majority voting, and also achieves better or comparable performance with several other state-of-the-art classifier combination approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 729
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P IEEE INT C SYST MA
[3]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV151005830
[4]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV160202285
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 18 INT C ART INT S
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, J R STAT SOC C-APPL, DOI 10.2307/2346806
[7]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[8]  
Breiman L, 1998, ANN STAT, V26, P801
[9]   EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].
Delorme, A ;
Makeig, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21
[10]   Ensemble methods in machine learning [J].
Dietterich, TG .
MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS, 2000, 1857 :1-15