THE CONTROL OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW BY MEANS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINTS

被引:0
作者
Gradzka, Ilona [1 ]
机构
[1] John Paul II Catholic Univ Lublin, Fac Law Canon Law & Adm, Lublin, Poland
来源
REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND COMPARATIVE LAW | 2021年 / 47卷 / 04期
关键词
Constitutional Tribunal; constitution; constitutional complaint; legal system;
D O I
10.31743/recl.12303
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The subject of this article is the institution of the constitutional complaint, which is analysed in connection with European integration. It should be noted that Poland's membership of the European Union has had a great influence, not only on the system of national law, but also on the jurisprudence of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal; therefore considerations are carried out here mainly in relation to the Constitutional Tribunal. In examining the issue of the constitutional complaint, the following assumptions may be stated. First, the constitutional-complaint procedure, is in fact, the examination of the compliance of legal norms with the Constitution, any deviation being related to the entities initiating proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal, Article 191(1)(6), of the Constitution', and to the material scope of the complaint, as determined in Article 79 of the Constitution. Second, there is no doubt that the constitutional complaint can become an important legal instrument shaping the jurisprudence of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, which has to face constitutional issues related to European integration'. Following the example of the practice of other Member States, e.g. Germany, the Tribunal may use the institution of the constitutional complaint as a means of controlling the compliance of the secondary law of the European Union with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 205
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bainczyk Magdalena, 2017, POLSKI NIEMIECKI TRY
  • [2] Barcz J., 2005, Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego, P169
  • [3] Biernat S., 2005, Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego, P185
  • [4] Bogdanowicz P., 2012, Europejski Przeglad Sadowy, P47
  • [5] Boguslaw Banaszak, 2008, PRAWO KONSTYTUCYJNE
  • [6] Chmielarz A, 2012, PRZEGL SEJMOWY, P9
  • [7] Czaplinski Wladyslaw, 2005, KWARTALNIK PRAWA PUB, P207
  • [8] Derlatka Marta, 2009, SKARGA KONSTYTUCYJNA
  • [9] Dzialocha Kazimierz, 2003, KOMENTARZ, V3
  • [10] Granat Miroslaw, 2017, ZMIENIAC KONSTYTUCJE, P43