Acetabular Erosion After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Proximal Femoral Replacement for Malignant Bone Tumors

被引:19
作者
Theil, Christoph [1 ]
Moellenbeck, Burkhard [1 ]
Gosheger, Georg [1 ]
Schmidt-Braekling, Tom [1 ]
Andreou, Dimosthenis [1 ]
Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp [1 ,2 ]
Dieckmann, Ralf [1 ]
机构
[1] Munster Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Tumor Orthoped, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Hosp Osnabruck, Dept Orthopaed, Osnabruck, Germany
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; THA revision; megaprostheses; proximal femoral replacement; acetabular revision; dual mobility; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; 4-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ENDOPROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION; DUAL MOBILITY; NECK; CLASSIFICATION; DISLOCATION; FRACTURES; REVISION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hemiarthroplasty megaprosthetic proximal femur reconstruction after tumor resection is a widespread procedure in orthopedic oncology. One potential complication is acetabular wear requiring secondary acetabular revision. The study's purpose is to investigate prevalence of acetabular erosion, secondary revisions, and potential risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively identified 112 patients who underwent proximal femur replacement after resection of a malignant bone tumor and had radiological follow-up longer than 12 months. Patient demographic, surgical, and oncologic factors were recorded, acetabular wear was measured using the classification proposed by Baker, and prosthetic failure was classified using the International Society on Limb Salvage classification. Functional assessment was performed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score and Harris Hip Score. Results: Prevalence of acetabular wear was 28.6%. Secondary conversion to total hip arthroplasty was required in 5 patients (4.6%), all treated for primary bone tumors. No patient treated for metastatic tumor had higher grade acetabular wear or required revision. Significant risk factors for the development of acetabular wear were age under 40 (P = .035) and longer follow-up (63 vs 43 months, P = .004). Other patient, surgical, or adjuvant treatment-related factors were not associated with acetabular revision or acetabular wear. The dislocation rate in the patient cohort was 0.9%. Conclusion: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty proximal femoral replacement represents a durable reconstruction after tumor resection. Hip instability is rare. Acetabular erosion is rare and can be successfully treated with conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Young patients with long-term survival over 10 years are at risk. In reconstruction for metastases, instability and acetabular wear are rare. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2692 / 2697
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ahlmann ER, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V88B, P790, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6
[2]   Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck - A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Baker, R. P. ;
Squires, B. ;
Gargan, M. F. ;
Bannister, G. C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (12) :2583-2589
[3]   The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty - Examining the successes and failures [J].
Berend, KR ;
Lombardi, AV ;
Mallory, TH ;
Adams, JB ;
Russell, JH ;
Groseth, KL .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07) :93-102
[4]   Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk:: An analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols [J].
Bielack, SS ;
Kempf-Bielack, B ;
Delling, G ;
Exner, GU ;
Flege, S ;
Helmke, K ;
Kotz, R ;
Salzer-Kuntschik, M ;
Werner, M ;
Winkelmann, W ;
Zoubek, A ;
Jürgens, H ;
Winkler, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :776-790
[5]   Acetabular outcome after hip hemiarthroplasty in patients with tumors [J].
Cannon, Christopher P. ;
Lin, Patrick P. ;
Lewis, Valerae O. ;
Yasko, Alan W. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (457) :183-187
[6]   Unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for tumour THE RISK OF REVISION IN YOUNG PATIENTS [J].
Chandrasekar, C. R. ;
Grimer, R. J. ;
Carter, S. R. ;
Tillman, R. M. ;
Abudu, A. ;
Jeys, L. M. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (03) :401-404
[7]   Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur [J].
Chandrasekar C.R. ;
Grimer R.J. ;
Carter S.R. ;
Tillman R.M. ;
Abudu A.T. .
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 3 (1)
[8]   Two stage revision with a proximal femur replacement [J].
Dieckmann, Ralf ;
Schmidt-Braekling, Tom ;
Gosheger, Georg ;
Theil, Christoph ;
Hardes, Jendrik ;
Moellenbeck, Burkhard .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
[9]   Clinical results of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed bipolar hemiarthroplasty [J].
Diwanji, Sanket R. ;
Kim, Sung Kyu ;
Seon, Jong Keun ;
Park, Sang Jin ;
Yoon, Taek Rim .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (07) :1009-1015
[10]   Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour - A long-term follow-up [J].
Donati, D ;
Zavatta, M ;
Gozzi, E ;
Giacomini, S ;
Campanacci, L ;
Mercuri, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (08) :1156-1160