Smokeless tobacco reduction with the nicotine lozenge and behavioral intervention

被引:14
作者
Ebbert, Jon O. [1 ]
Edmonds, Amanda [2 ,3 ]
Luo, Xianghua [2 ,3 ]
Jensen, Joni [2 ,3 ]
Hatsukami, Dorothy K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Tobacco Use Res Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Ctr Canc, Minneapolis, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SMOKING REDUCTION; SNUFF;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntq088
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Studies have evaluated smoking reduction with nicotine replacement therapy to reduce tobacco exposure and facilitate abstinence among cigarette smokers, but none have evaluated a reduction approach in smokeless tobacco (ST) users. Methods: We conducted an open-label pilot study to determine if the 4-mg nicotine lozenge with a behavioral intervention could facilitate ST use reduction among ST users compared with a behavioral intervention alone. Eligible subjects were ST users not interested in quitting. Results: One hundred and two subjects were randomized. Both interventions were associated with significant decreases in ST use and toxicant exposure and with increased abstinence, quit attempts, and duration of abstinence. However, no significant differences were observed between groups for these outcomes. Discussion: A behavioral intervention with or without the nicotine lozenge may be effective for decreasing both ST use and toxicant exposure and for increasing tobacco abstinence, quit attempts, and duration of abstinence. The use of reduction strategies for ST users not interested in quitting deserves further evaluation as an intervention strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 827
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Cnaan A, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P2349, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971030)16:20<2349::AID-SIM667>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-E
[3]   Do behavioral smoking reduction approaches reach more or different smokers? Two studies; similar answers [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Gaglio, B ;
France, EK ;
Marcus, A ;
Riley, KM ;
Levinson, A ;
Bischoff, K .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2006, 31 (03) :509-518
[4]   Smokeless tobacco brand switching: A means to reduce toxicant exposure? [J].
Hatsukami, D. K. ;
Ebbert, J. O. ;
Anderson, A. ;
Lin, H. ;
Le, C. ;
Hecht, S. S. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2007, 87 (2-3) :217-224
[5]   Preliminary study on reducing oral moist snuff use [J].
Hatsukami, DK ;
Edmonds, A ;
Schulte, S ;
Jensen, J ;
Le, CT ;
Losey, L ;
Carmella, SG ;
Hecht, SS .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 70 (02) :215-220
[6]   Smokeless tobacco reduction: Preliminary study of tobacco-free snuff versus no snuff [J].
Hatsukami, Dorothy K. ;
Ebbert, Jon O. ;
Edmonds, Amanda ;
Li, Casey ;
Lin, Haiying ;
Le, Chap ;
Hecht, Stephen S. .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01) :77-85
[7]  
Hecht SS, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P590
[8]   Does smoking reduction increase future cessation and decrease disease risk? A qualitative review [J].
Hughes, John R. ;
Carpenter, Matthew J. .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (06) :739-749
[9]   The feasibility of smoking reduction: an update [J].
Hughes, JR ;
Carpenter, MJ .
ADDICTION, 2005, 100 (08) :1074-1089
[10]  
Littell RC, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1793, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1793::AID-SIM482>3.3.CO