Scale of management for mature male white-tailed deer as influenced by home range and movements

被引:38
作者
Webb, Stephen L.
Hewitt, David G.
Hellickson, Mickey W.
机构
[1] Texas A&I Univ, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Res Inst, Kingsville, TX 78363 USA
[2] King Ranch Inc, Kingsville, TX 78364 USA
关键词
dispersal; fidelity; home range; management; Odocoileus virginianus; Texas; white-tailed deer;
D O I
10.2193/2006-300
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The scale at which populations use landscapes influences ecological processes and management. We used dispersal and home-range data of 3 age groups of male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to determine the scale at which management will be effective. Home-range size at 5.5 years of age (182 ha +/- 24.9 SE) was 56% smaller (P < 0.001) than home-range size of the same 13 males as yearlings (416 +/- 59.4 ha). Percent overlap of yearling and 5.5-year-old home ranges was 62.7 +/- 10.3% (n = 13). Distance between home-range centers of yearling and mature deer was 1,264.9 +/- 407.4 in, including 3 deer that dispersed after 2.5 years of age. Average 95% fixed-kernel home-range size was 207.4 +/- 20.4 ha and 225.7 +/- 30.1 ha for all mature males in years 1 and 2 of our study, respectively. We found that properties > 10,000 ha were needed to manage > 50% of original yearling males found on the property, whereas properties of 4,500 ha would maintain 50% of original middle-aged (2.5-4.5 yr of age) and mature males (>= 4.5 yr of age). Movements after dispersal were minimal, with deer shifting their center of activity < 600 m and < 350 in each year for middle-aged and mature males, respectively. These data could be used by managers developing management plans, recommending harvest rates, and interpreting harvest data of male white-tailed deer and by biologists attempting to understand ecological processes such as spread of disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1507 / 1512
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Andreassen HP, 2002, DISPERSAL ECOLOGY, P237
  • [2] BARNETT DA, 1986, P 9 ANN M SE DEER ST, P18
  • [3] BARRETT M W, 1982, Wildlife Society Bulletin, V10, P108
  • [4] BEASOM SL, 1986, WILDLIFE SOC B, V14, P364
  • [5] BROWN BA, 1971, THESIS TEXAS A M U C
  • [6] Campbell TA, 2005, WILDLIFE SOC B, V33, P212, DOI 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[212:PCOACA]2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates
    De Solla, SR
    Bonduriansky, R
    Brooks, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 68 (02) : 221 - 234
  • [9] DEYOUNG CA, 1988, WILDLIFE SOC B, V16, P318
  • [10] DEYOUNG CA, 1985, WILDLIFE SOC B, V13, P146