Canonical reduction of second-order fitted models subject to linear restrictions

被引:4
作者
Draper, NR
Pukelsheim, F
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Augsburg, D-8900 Augsburg, Germany
关键词
canonical reduction; linear restrictions; mixture data; response surfaces;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-7152(03)00119-6
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Canonical reduction of second-order response surfaces is a useful technique for finding the form and shape of surfaces and often for discovering redundancies that enable the surface to be expressible in a simpler form with fewer canonical predictor variables than there are original predictor variables. Canonical reduction of models subject to linear restrictions has received little attention, possibly due to the apparent difficulty of per-forming it. An important special application is when the predictor variables are mixture ingredients that must sum to a constant; other linear restrictions may also be encountered in such problems. A possible difficulty in interpretation is that the stationary point may fall outside the permissible restricted space. Here, techniques for performing such a canonical reduction are given, and two mixture examples in the literature are re-examined, and canonically reduced, to illustrate what canonical reduction can and cannot provide. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 410
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Box G, 1987, EMPIRICAL MODEL BUIL
[2]  
BURES S, 1992, P 1991 KANS STAT U C, P43
[3]  
CORNELL JA, 2002, EXPT MIXTURES
[4]   Generalized ridge analysis under linear restrictions, with particular applications to mixture experiments problems [J].
Draper, NR ;
Pukelsheim, F .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2002, 44 (03) :250-259
[5]   THE APPLICATION OF RIDGE TECHNIQUES TO MIXTURE DATA - RIDGE ANALYSIS [J].
HOERL, RW .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1987, 29 (02) :161-172
[6]  
KISSELL LT, 1962, CEREAL CHEM, V39, P16
[7]   A GENERAL-APPROACH TO RIDGE ANALYSIS WITH CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS [J].
PETERSON, JJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1993, 35 (02) :204-214