Influence of different disinfection protocols on gutta-percha cones surface roughness assessed by two different methods

被引:0
|
作者
Nunes, A. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gouvea, J. P. [1 ]
da Silva, L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Escola Engn Ind Met Volta Redonda, Programa Posgrad Engn Met, BR-27255125 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Volta Redonda, Odontol, BR-27240560 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[3] Ctr Univ Volta Redonda, Programa Posgrad Odontol, BR-27240560 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Inst Ciencias Exatas, Dept Fis, BR-27213145 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T | 2019年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
Filling materials; Endodontics; Roughness; Confocal microscope; SODIUM-HYPOCHLORITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mrt.7019.09.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate how different disinfection protocols affect the surface roughness of gutta-percha (GP) cones used for the dental root canal filling using DIN 4768 standard and another alternative process for assessing roughness of small surface area (multiple profile), comparing both methods in order to identify similarities. The GP cones used were the conventional (C) and a new one impregnated with zirconia oxide, known as the coated cone (CC). Samples were distributed for each group and they were immersed in the correspondent chemical solution as follows: Group 1 (G1), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) at 5.25% for 1 min; Group 2 (G2), sodium hypochlorite at 2.5% for 10 min; and Group 3 (G3), chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) at 2% for 5 min, as recommended by dentistry protocols. The averages and standard deviations of the surface roughness parameters-average roughness (Ra) and root mean square deviation roughness (R-q)-were calculated. Statistical analysis was made before and after immersion by paired t-test. Results showed a statistically significant difference for C GP cones after immersion in 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl (p < 0.01). No difference was found in CC GP cones. DIN 4768 standard and multiple profile measurements showed similar trends and behavior. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:5464 / 5470
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations-In Vitro Study
    Darwich, Rama A.
    Awad, Manal
    Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [32] Influence of Different Proportions of External Irrigation During the Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Irradiation on Wear and Roughness of Root Surface
    Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Guilherme Jose
    Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo
    Carvalho, Heglecia da Luz
    Scardueli, Cassio Rocha
    Chierici Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [33] Influence of different post-processing methods on surface topography of fused deposition modelling samples
    Krishna, Amogh, V
    Faulcon, M.
    Timmers, B.
    Reddy, Vijeth V.
    Barth, H.
    Nilsson, G.
    Rosen, B. G.
    SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY-METROLOGY AND PROPERTIES, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [34] Study of the Influence of the Different Parameters of the Atmospheric DBD Treatment on the Surface Roughness and the Electric Potential Distribution Generated After the Tribocharging of Polypropylene
    Tilmatine, Omar
    Zeghloul, Thami
    Fatu, Aurelian
    Dascalescu, Lucian
    Medles, Karim
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2021, 57 (04) : 4162 - 4169
  • [35] RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF SURFACE FRACTAL DIMENSION IN METAL-CERAMIC COATINGS SPUTTERED BY RF-MAGNETRON
    Gonzalez-Hernandez, A.
    Suarez-Domi Nguez, E. J.
    Aperador, W.
    Morales-Cepeda, A. B.
    Izquierdo-Kulich, E. F.
    Caicedo, J. C.
    SURFACE REVIEW AND LETTERS, 2022, 29 (07)