Influence of different disinfection protocols on gutta-percha cones surface roughness assessed by two different methods

被引:0
|
作者
Nunes, A. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gouvea, J. P. [1 ]
da Silva, L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Escola Engn Ind Met Volta Redonda, Programa Posgrad Engn Met, BR-27255125 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Volta Redonda, Odontol, BR-27240560 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[3] Ctr Univ Volta Redonda, Programa Posgrad Odontol, BR-27240560 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Inst Ciencias Exatas, Dept Fis, BR-27213145 Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T | 2019年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
Filling materials; Endodontics; Roughness; Confocal microscope; SODIUM-HYPOCHLORITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mrt.7019.09.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate how different disinfection protocols affect the surface roughness of gutta-percha (GP) cones used for the dental root canal filling using DIN 4768 standard and another alternative process for assessing roughness of small surface area (multiple profile), comparing both methods in order to identify similarities. The GP cones used were the conventional (C) and a new one impregnated with zirconia oxide, known as the coated cone (CC). Samples were distributed for each group and they were immersed in the correspondent chemical solution as follows: Group 1 (G1), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) at 5.25% for 1 min; Group 2 (G2), sodium hypochlorite at 2.5% for 10 min; and Group 3 (G3), chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) at 2% for 5 min, as recommended by dentistry protocols. The averages and standard deviations of the surface roughness parameters-average roughness (Ra) and root mean square deviation roughness (R-q)-were calculated. Statistical analysis was made before and after immersion by paired t-test. Results showed a statistically significant difference for C GP cones after immersion in 2% CHX and 2.5% NaOCl (p < 0.01). No difference was found in CC GP cones. DIN 4768 standard and multiple profile measurements showed similar trends and behavior. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:5464 / 5470
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Influence of surface crystallinity on the surface roughness of different ceramic glazes
    Sheikhattar, Mahmood
    Attar, Hooyar
    Sharafi, Shahriar
    Carty, William M.
    MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION, 2016, 118 : 570 - 574
  • [22] In Vitro Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Color Variation after Two Brushing Protocols with Toothpastes Containing Different Whitening Technologies
    Lobito, Angel
    Colaco, Catarina
    Costa, Joana
    Caldeira, Jorge
    Proenca, Luis
    Mendes, Jose Joao
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [23] The measurement of surface roughness to determine the suitability of different methods for stone cleaning
    Vazquez-Calvo, Carmen
    Alvarez de Buergo, Monica
    Fort, Rafael
    Jose Varas-Muriel, Maria
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 9 (04) : S108 - S117
  • [24] Effect of different disinfection protocols on the surface properties of CAD-CAM denture base materials
    Atalay, Sevda
    Cakmak, Gulce
    Fonseca, Manrique
    Schimmel, Martin
    Yilmaz, Burak
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (05): : 787 - 795
  • [25] The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
    Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari
    Penumatsa, Narendra Varma
    Priya, Tulasi
    Baroudi, Kusai
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2014, 4 (05): : 99 - 104
  • [26] Influence of creep phenomenon and surface roughness on the adhesion of Xenopus laevis eggs to different substrates
    Kampf, N
    Nussinovitch, A
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) : 453 - 475
  • [27] Effect of Application Time of Two Different Disinfectants on the Surface Roughness of an Elastomeric Impression Material
    Karaman, Tahir
    Oztekin, Faruk
    Tekin, Samet
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (07) : ZC10 - ZC13
  • [28] Surface Roughness Analysis of Microchannels Featuring Microfluidic Devices Fabricated by Three Different Materials and Methods
    Acosta-Cuevas, Jose M.
    Garcia-Ramirez, Mario A.
    Hinojosa-Ventura, Gabriela
    Martinez-Gomez, Alvaro J.
    Perez-Luna, Victor H.
    Gonzalez-Reynoso, Orfil
    COATINGS, 2023, 13 (10)
  • [29] Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach
    Janus, J.
    Fauxpoint, G.
    Arntz, Y.
    Pelletier, H.
    Etienne, O.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (05) : 416 - 425
  • [30] Influence of Different Surface Finishing Protocols on the Wear Behavior of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramics
    Weber, Katia R.
    Satpathy, Megha
    Marocho, Susana Salazar
    Griggs, Jason A.
    Borba, Marcia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 (03) : 293 - 299