Developing and pilot testing a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice

被引:25
作者
Finderup, Jeanette [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Jens K. D. [1 ,2 ]
Lomborg, Kirsten [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Complex intervention; Patient decision aid; Patient involvement; Shared decision-making; MODALITY SELECTION; AID; EDUCATION; HEMODIALYSIS; INVOLVEMENT; KIDNEYS; ACCESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jorc.12241
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundEvidence is inconclusive on how best to guide the patient in decision-making around haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis choice. International guidelines recommend involvement of the patient in the decision to choose the dialysis modality most suitable for the individual patient. Nevertheless, studies have shown lack of involvement of the patient in decision-making. ObjectivesTo develop and pilot test an intervention for shared decision-making targeting the choice of dialysis modality. MethodsThis study reflects the first two phases of a complex intervention design: phase 1, the development process and phase 2, feasibility and piloting. Because decision aids were a part of the intervention, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards were considered. The pilot test included both the intervention and the feasibility of the validated shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM Q9) and the Decision Quality Measure (DQM) applied to evaluate the intervention. ResultsA total of 137 patients tested the intervention. After the intervention, 80% of the patients chose dialysis at home reflecting an increase of 23% in starting dialysis at home prior to the study. The SDM Q9 showed the majority of the patients experienced this intervention as shared decision-making. ConclusionAn intervention based on shared decision-making supported by decision aids seemed to increase the number of patients choosing home dialysis. The SDM Q9 and DQM were feasible evaluation tools. Further research is needed to gain insight into the patients' experiences of involvement and the implications for their choice of dialysis modality.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 161
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   PATIENTS EXPERIENCES OF INVOLVEMENT IN CHOICE OF DIALYSIS MODE [J].
Erlang, Anne S. ;
Nielsen, Ida H. ;
Hansen, Helle O. B. ;
Finderup, Jeanette .
JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2015, 41 (04) :260-267
[12]   End-stage kidney disease patient evaluation of the Australian 'My Kidneys, My Choice' decision aid [J].
Fortnum, Debbie ;
Grennan, Kirren ;
Smolonogov, Tatiana .
CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (04) :469-475
[13]   'MY KIDNEYS, MY CHOICE, DECISION AID': SUPPORTING SHARED DECISION MAKING [J].
Fortnum, Debbie ;
Smolonogov, Tatiana ;
Walker, Rachael ;
Kairaitis, Luke ;
Pugh, Debbie .
JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2015, 41 (02) :81-87
[14]   Understanding pre-dialysis modality decision-making: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies [J].
Harwood, Lori ;
Clark, Alexander M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2013, 50 (01) :109-120
[15]  
Healthwise, 2017, KIDN FAIL WHAT TYP D
[16]   The impact of patient preference on dialysis modality and hemodialysis vascular access [J].
Keating, Patrick T. ;
Walsh, Michael ;
Ribic, Christine M. ;
Brimble, Kenneth Scott .
BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 15
[17]   Patients' perspectives of factors affecting modality selection: A National Kidney Foundation patient survey [J].
King, K .
ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2000, 7 (03) :261-268
[18]  
Kirkegaard P., 2015, EUROPEAN J PUBLIC HL, V26, P1761
[19]   The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample [J].
Kriston, Levente ;
Scholl, Isabelle ;
Hoelzel, Lars ;
Simon, Daniela ;
Loh, Andreas ;
Haerter, Martin .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 80 (01) :94-99
[20]  
Loiselle Marie-Chantal, 2011, CANNT J, V21, P13