Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment in Community Health Facilities: A Multisite Longitudinal Study

被引:11
作者
Arbach, Karin [1 ]
Bobbio, Antonella [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
Intimate partner violence; Structured risk assessment; Community health facilities; Prospective; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; RECIDIVISM; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; OFFENDERS;
D O I
10.5093/pi2018a13
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The remarkable development of tools for the structured assessment of violent reoffending of intimate partner aggressors coexists with a relative scarcity of tools adapted for the diversity of community facilities for women who suffer intimate partner violence (IPV). This situation prompted the development of the RVD-Bcn in Catalonia (Spain). The present multisite prospective study is the first to test the predictive validity of this tool for IPV risk assessment in a sample different to the original. Trained assessors interviewed 321 women in five community health facilities in Cordoba (Argentina); 230 of them completed a follow-up that ranged from 47 to 311 days. Incidents of physical IPV, including serious threats and forced sex, were recorded prospectively. Rates of IPV in the low, moderate and high-risk groups were 10, 57, and 33 percent, respectively. The summary risk ratings were significantly associated with the occurrence of violence during follow-up, as were RVD scores (ROC-AUCs = .88 and .89, respectively). Low-risk participants not only suffered fewer IPV events than participants in the moderate and high-risk group, but also suffered them later in time. The most accurate predictive model of IPV included total scores and a dichotomised variable of low vs. moderate-high summary risk rating. Findings contribute to the emerging practice of including structured violence risk assessment in Latin American professional contexts and institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]  
Hanson K., 2007, VALIDITY RISK ASSESS
[32]  
Heise L., 2002, WORLD REPORT VIOLENC, P87
[33]   A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment [J].
Hilton, NZ ;
Harris, GT ;
Rice, ME ;
Lang, C ;
Cormier, CA ;
Lines, KJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (03) :267-275
[34]  
IBM Corp, 2016, SPSS STAT WIND
[35]  
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censos [National Institute of Statistics and Census], 2018, REG UN CAS VIOL MUJ
[36]   Risk factors related to intimate partner violence police recidivism in Spain [J].
Jose Lopez-Ossorio, Juan ;
Gonzalez Alvarez, Jose Luis ;
Buquerin Pascual, Sara ;
Garcia, Luis F. ;
Buela-Casal, Gualberto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 17 (02) :107-119
[37]  
Kropp PR, 2010, INT PERSP FOREN MENT, P227
[38]   Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment and Management [J].
Kropp, P. Randall .
VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2008, 23 (02) :202-220
[39]   The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders [J].
Kropp, PR ;
Hart, SD .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2000, 24 (01) :101-118
[40]  
Kropp R., 1999, SPOUSAL ASSAULT RISK