Maximum likelihood versus likelihood-free quantum system identification in the atom maser

被引:5
作者
Catana, Catalin [1 ]
Kypraios, Theodore [1 ]
Guta, Madalin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Math Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
system identification; atom maser; approximate Bayes computation; maximum likelihood; PROBABILISTIC FUNCTIONS; ASYMPTOTIC NORMALITY; PUMPING STATISTICS; MARKOV; MICROMASER; ESTIMATOR; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1088/1751-8113/47/41/415302
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of estimating a dynamical parameter of a Markovian quantum open system (the atom maser), by performing continuous time measurements in the system's output (outgoing atoms). Two estimation methods are investigated and compared. Firstly, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) takes into account the full measurement data and is asymptotically optimal in terms of its mean square error. Secondly, the 'likelihood-free' method of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) produces an approximation of the posterior distribution for a given set of summary statistics, by sampling trajectories at different parameter values and comparing them with the measurement data via chosen statistics. Building on previous results which showed that atom counts are poor statistics for certain values of the Rabi angle, we apply MLE to the full measurement data and estimate its Fisher information. We then select several correlation statistics such as waiting times, distribution of successive identical detections, and use them as input of the ABC algorithm. The resulting posterior distribution follows closely the data likelihood, showing that the selected statistics capture 'most' statistical information about the Rabi angle.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Blind maximum likelihood identification of Hammerstein systems
    Vanbeylen, Laurent
    Pintelon, Rik
    Schoukens, Johan
    AUTOMATICA, 2008, 44 (12) : 3139 - 3146
  • [22] Accuracy analysis of time domain maximum likelihood method and sample maximum likelihood method for errors-in-variables and output error identification
    Soderstrom, Torsten
    Hong, Mei
    Schoukens, Johan
    Pintelon, Rik
    AUTOMATICA, 2010, 46 (04) : 721 - 727
  • [23] Bayesian likelihood-free localisation of a biochemical source using multiple dispersion models
    Ristic, Branko
    Gunatilaka, Ajith
    Gailis, Ralph
    Skvortsov, Alex
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 108 : 13 - 24
  • [24] Likelihood-free simulation-based optimal design with an application to spatial extremes
    Hainy, Markus
    Mueller, Werner G.
    Wagner, Helga
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (02) : 481 - 492
  • [25] Improved maximum likelihood method for ship parameter identification
    Chen, Hongli
    Li, Qiang
    Wang, Ziyuan
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 1614 - 1621
  • [26] Maximum likelihood identification of stable linear dynamical systems
    Umenberger, Jack
    Wagberg, Johan
    Manchester, Ian R.
    Schon, Thomas B.
    AUTOMATICA, 2018, 96 : 280 - 292
  • [27] Simulated Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Identification of Nonlinear Models
    Abdalmoaty, Mohamed Rasheed
    Hjalmarsson, Hakan
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 14058 - 14063
  • [28] Multitask Maximum Likelihood Identification for ARX Model With Multisensor
    Ping, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Kang
    Zhao, Shunyi
    Luan, Xiaoli
    Liu, Fei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2022, 71
  • [29] Maximum likelihood identification of Wiener-Hammerstein models
    Haryanto, Ade
    Hong, Keum-Shik
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 41 (1-2) : 54 - 70
  • [30] Vibration Model Identification using the Maximum Likelihood Method
    Escarate, Pedro
    Coronel, Maria
    Gonzalez, Karen
    Carvajal, Rodrigo
    Aguero, Juan C.
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS VI, 2018, 10703