Maximum likelihood versus likelihood-free quantum system identification in the atom maser

被引:5
作者
Catana, Catalin [1 ]
Kypraios, Theodore [1 ]
Guta, Madalin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Math Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
system identification; atom maser; approximate Bayes computation; maximum likelihood; PROBABILISTIC FUNCTIONS; ASYMPTOTIC NORMALITY; PUMPING STATISTICS; MARKOV; MICROMASER; ESTIMATOR; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1088/1751-8113/47/41/415302
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of estimating a dynamical parameter of a Markovian quantum open system (the atom maser), by performing continuous time measurements in the system's output (outgoing atoms). Two estimation methods are investigated and compared. Firstly, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) takes into account the full measurement data and is asymptotically optimal in terms of its mean square error. Secondly, the 'likelihood-free' method of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) produces an approximation of the posterior distribution for a given set of summary statistics, by sampling trajectories at different parameter values and comparing them with the measurement data via chosen statistics. Building on previous results which showed that atom counts are poor statistics for certain values of the Rabi angle, we apply MLE to the full measurement data and estimate its Fisher information. We then select several correlation statistics such as waiting times, distribution of successive identical detections, and use them as input of the ABC algorithm. The resulting posterior distribution follows closely the data likelihood, showing that the selected statistics capture 'most' statistical information about the Rabi angle.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Likelihood-free parallel tempering
    Baragatti, Meili
    Grimaud, Agnes
    Pommeret, Denys
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2013, 23 (04) : 535 - 549
  • [2] Likelihood-free estimation of model evidence
    Didelot, Xavier
    Everitt, Richard G.
    Johansen, Adam M.
    Lawson, Daniel J.
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2011, 6 (01): : 49 - 76
  • [3] Maximum Likelihood pqEDMD Identification
    Garcia-Tenorio, Camilo
    Wouwer, Alain Vande
    2022 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM THEORY, CONTROL AND COMPUTING (ICSTCC), 2022, : 540 - 545
  • [4] Sensitivity Metrics for Maximum Likelihood System Identification
    Matarazzo, Thomas J.
    Pakzad, Shamim N.
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 2 (03):
  • [5] Maximum likelihood identification of Wiener models
    Hagenblad, Anna
    Ljung, Lennart
    Wills, Adrian
    AUTOMATICA, 2008, 44 (11) : 2697 - 2705
  • [6] Efficient likelihood-free Bayesian Computation for household epidemics
    Neal, Peter
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2012, 22 (06) : 1239 - 1256
  • [7] Reliable Gradient-free and Likelihood-free Prompt Tuning
    Shen, Maohao
    Ghosh, Soumya
    Sattigeri, Prasanna
    Das, Subhro
    Bu, Yuheng
    Wornell, Gregory
    17TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EACL 2023, 2023, : 2416 - 2429
  • [8] Likelihood-Free Parameter Estimation with Neural Bayes Estimators
    Sainsbury-Dale, Matthew
    Zammit-Mangion, Andrew
    Huser, Raphael
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2024, 78 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [9] A comparison of likelihood-free methods with and without summary statistics
    Drovandi, Christopher
    Frazier, David T.
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2022, 32 (03)
  • [10] Likelihood-free MCMC with Amortized Approximate Ratio Estimators
    Hermans, Joeri
    Begy, Volodimir
    Louppe, Gilles
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119, 2020, 119