Signal Space Separation for Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free magnetometer

被引:2
作者
Gao, Yang [1 ]
Shi, Zemin [2 ]
Ma, Xin [3 ]
He, Ning [2 ]
Tang, Xiaogang [2 ]
Wang, Defeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ BUAA, Sch Phys, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ BUAA, Sch Instrumentat & Optoelect Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] BeiHang Univ BUAA, Res Inst Frontier Sci, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AND PRINTABLE SENSORS AND SYSTEMS (FLEPS) | 2021年
关键词
Magnetoencephalography; signal space separation; Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free magnetometer; MEG;
D O I
10.1109/FLEPS51544.2021.9469769
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides a real-time, non-invasive investigation of brain activity, which is very important for deep understanding of neuroscience. But MEG signals are often contaminated by various artifacts. Signal space separation (SSS) is a technique based on quasi-static Maxwell equations and Laplace equations. It can be used as a spatial filter for MEG signals denoising. In this paper, the SSS spatial filtering is carried out with multi-channel Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free (SERF) magnetometer equipment for the first time, and the signal fluctuation is significantly reduced after filtering. One automatic method has been developed in this study to find the best SSS parameters based on the Sequential Least Squares Programming. This paper used MNE-pyhton software to generate spatial noise and internal source signal, and compared the denoised signal with internal simulation signal to find the optimal SSS parameters. The experimental results showed that the auditory evoked response was more obvious and the signal-to-noise ratio of the signal is improved in the induced period after SSS filtering.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Overview of MEG
    Ahlfors, Seppo P.
    Mody, Maria
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2019, 22 (01) : 95 - 115
  • [2] Magnetic field imaging with microfabricated optically-pumped magnetometers
    Alem, Orang
    Mhaskar, Rahul
    Jimenez-Martinez, Ricardo
    Sheng, Dong
    LeBlanc, John
    Trahms, Lutz
    Sander, Tilmann
    Kitching, John
    Knappe, Svenja
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2017, 25 (07): : 7849 - 7858
  • [3] Brodmann K, 2007, Brodmann's: Localisation in the cerebral cortex
  • [4] Comparison of DSSP and tSSS algorithms for removing artifacts from vagus nerve stimulators in magnetoencephalography data
    Cai, Chang
    Kang, Huicong
    Kirsch, Heidi E.
    Mizuiri, Danielle
    Chen, Jessie
    Bhutada, Abhishek
    Sekihara, Kensuke
    Nagarajan, Srikantan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (06)
  • [5] Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity
    Dale, AM
    Liu, AK
    Fischl, BR
    Buckner, RL
    Belliveau, JW
    Lewine, JD
    Halgren, E
    [J]. NEURON, 2000, 26 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [6] Fonov V., 2009, Neuroimage, V47, pS102, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5, 10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5]
  • [7] Choice of Magnetometers and Gradiometers after Signal Space Separation
    Garces, Pilar
    Lopez-Sanz, David
    Maestu, Fernando
    Pereda, Ernesto
    [J]. SENSORS, 2017, 17 (12)
  • [8] MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data
    Gramfort, Alexandre
    Luessi, Martin
    Larson, Eric
    Engemann, Denis A.
    Strohmeier, Daniel
    Brodbeck, Christian
    Parkkonen, Lauri
    Haemaelaeinen, Matti S.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 86 : 446 - 460
  • [9] Gupta M, 2018, INT CONF CONTEMP, P380
  • [10] Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system
    Hill, Ryan M.
    Boto, Elena
    Rea, Molly
    Holmes, Niall
    Leggett, James
    Coles, Laurence A.
    Papastavrou, Manolis
    Everton, Sarah K.
    Hunt, Benjamin A. E.
    Sims, Dominic
    Osborne, James
    Shah, Vishal
    Bowtell, Richard
    Brookes, Matthew J.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 219