Hysterectomy after endometrial ablation-resection

被引:31
作者
Comino, R [1 ]
Torrejón, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Puerto Real, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS | 2004年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60082-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To evaluate the reasons for performing a hysterectomy in patients who had previously undergone endometrial ablation-resection (EA-R), after a follow-up of at least 6 years. Design. Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting. University-affiliated hospital. Patients. Eighty-nine premenopausal women who underwent EA-R from February 1991 through February 2003. Interventions. Endometrial ablation-resection by electrocoagulation using a rollerball of the uterine fundus and tubal ostia zone, and electroresection using a cutting loop of the rest of the uterine cavity. Measurements and Main Results. During a minimum follow-up period of 6 years, hysterectomy was performed in 16 of 89 (77.97%) patients. In eight (9%) patients, hysterectomy was performed exclusively because of the failure of EA-R. The only factor that was related significantly to the increased possibility of requiring subsequent hysterectomy was the existence of myomas. Conclusion. After long-term follow-up (more than 5 years), approximately one out of every five women who undergo EA-R will require a hysterectomy. The majority of these will be required during the first 2 years following EA-R. The existence of uterine myomas at the time of EA-R can be considered a risk factor for the subsequent need for hysterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 499
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ANDIA D, 2001, CLIN INVEST GIN OBST, V28, P126
[2]   Five-year follow-up of endometrial ablation: Endometrial coagulation versus endometrial resection [J].
Boujida, VH ;
Philipsen, T ;
Pelle, J ;
Joergensen, JC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (06) :988-992
[3]   Long-term results of endometrial ablation-resection [J].
Comino, R ;
Torrejón, R ;
Sánchez-Ortega, I .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (03) :268-271
[4]  
Cooper KG, 2001, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V108, P1222, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00275.x
[5]   Outcomes after rollerball endometrial ablation for menorrhagia [J].
Dutton, C ;
Ackerson, L ;
Phelps-Sandall, B .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (01) :35-39
[6]   Endometrial resection: factors affecting long-term success [J].
Gandhi, SV ;
Fear, KBC ;
Sturdee, DW .
GYNAECOLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 8 (01) :41-50
[7]   600 ENDOMETRIAL LASER ABLATIONS [J].
GARRY, R ;
SHELLEYJONES, D ;
MOONEY, P ;
PHILLIPS, G .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (01) :24-29
[8]   Long-term follow-up of endometrial ablation by modified loop resection [J].
Lefler, HT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2003, 10 (04) :517-520
[9]   Five-year follow-up of patients participating in a randomized trial of uterine balloon therapy versus rollerball ablation for treatment of menorrhagia [J].
Loffer, FD ;
Grainger, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (04) :429-435
[10]   Previous tubal ligation is a risk factor for hysterectomy after rollerball endometrial ablation [J].
Mall, A ;
Shirk, G ;
Van Voorhis, BJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (04) :659-664