Practice-based professional development and Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade

被引:76
作者
Harris, Karen R. [1 ]
Graham, Steve [1 ]
Adkins, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85259 USA
[2] Goucher Coll, Towson, MD USA
关键词
Professional development; Writing; Tier; 2; Self-regulated strategies development; Practice based professional development; STRUGGLING YOUNG WRITERS; WRITING INSTRUCTION; OPINION ESSAY; STUDENTS; TEACHERS; INTERVENTION; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In this randomized controlled study, we investigated implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) in story writing by 11 second grade teachers who first collaborated in practice-based professional development in SRSD. Students at-risk for failure in writing were randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions in each teacher's classroom. Teachers implemented SRSD with small groups of students at-risk for failure in writing (referred to as Tier 2 intervention in the Response to Intervention, or RTI, model) in their classrooms; control students at-risk in writing received regular classroom instruction from their teachers. Integrity of strategies instruction and social validity were assessed among the participating teachers. Student outcomes assessed included inclusion of genre elements and story quality, generalization to personal narrative, and teacher perceptions of intrinsic motivation and effort for writing. Teachers implemented strategies instruction with high integrity; social validity was positive. Significant effects were found for inclusion of genre elements and story quality at both posttest and maintenance; effect sizes were large (.89-1.65). Intervention also resulted in significant generalization to personal narrative (effect sizes were .98 for elements and .88 for quality). Teachers reported significantly higher perceptions of both intrinsic motivation and effort (effect sizes were 1.09 and 1.07, respectively). Limitations and directions for future research are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 16
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, RESPONSE INTERVENTIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The nations report card: Writing 2011 [html]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Journal of Teacher Education, V60, P458, DOI DOI 10.1177/0022487109347206
[4]  
Applebee A.N., 2011, ENGL J, V100, P14
[5]  
*ASCD, 2002, TEACH STUD LEARN DIS
[6]   Teaching Writing to At-Risk Students: The Quality of Evidence for Self-Regulated Strategy Development [J].
Baker, Scott K. ;
Chard, David J. ;
Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R. ;
Apichatabutra, Chanisa ;
Doabler, Christian .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2009, 75 (03) :303-318
[7]   Content Knowledge for Teaching What Makes It Special? [J].
Ball, Deborah Loewenberg ;
Thames, Mark Hoover ;
Phelps, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 59 (05) :389-407
[8]  
Ball DL., 1999, Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, P3, DOI DOI 10.3102/0162373708322737
[9]  
Ball DL., 2009, Journal of Teacher Education, V60, P497, DOI [10.1177/0022487109348479, DOI 10.1177/0022487109348479]
[10]  
Berninger V., 2003, The Process Assessment of the Learner: Reading and Writing Lessons