Delayed access to feed early post-hatch affects the development and maturation of gastrointestinal tract microbiota in broiler chickens

被引:13
作者
Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika [1 ]
Miska, Katarzyna B. [1 ]
Ellestad, Laura E. [2 ]
Schreier, Lori L. [1 ]
Kahl, Stanislaw [1 ]
Darwish, Nadia [1 ,3 ]
Campos, Philip [1 ,3 ]
Shao, Jonathan [3 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Agr USDA, Agr Res Serv ARS, Northeast Area NEA, Anim Biosci & Biotechnol Lab ABBL, 10300 Baltimore Ave,B-200,Rm 100B, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Poultry Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] US Dept Agr USDA, Agr Res Serv ARS, Northeast Area NEA, Stat Grp, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Chicken; Ileum; Ceca; Microbiota; 16S; Delayed access to feed; EARLY NEONATAL DEVELOPMENT; GUT MICROBIOTA; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; METABOLIC PATHWAYS; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; HATCH; PERFORMANCE; COLLECTION; EXPRESSION; INTESTINE;
D O I
10.1186/s12866-022-02619-6
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background The first two weeks of post-hatch (PH) growth in broilers (meat-type birds) are critical for gut development and microbiota colonization. In the current broiler production system, chicks may not receive feed and water for 24 to 72 h due to variations in hatching time and hatchery management. Post-hatch feed delay affects body weight, feed efficiency, mortality, and gut development. The goal of this study was to investigate changes in the microbiome in broiler chickens early PH and the effect of delayed access to feed on the microbiota. Results Chicks either received feed and water immediately after hatch or access to feed was delayed for 48 h to mimic commercial hatchery settings (treatment, TRT). Both groups were sampled (n = 6) at -48, 0, 4 h, and 1 (24 h), 2 (48 h), 3 (72 h), 4 (96 h), 6 (144 h), 8 (192 h), 10 (240 h), 12 (288 h) and 14 (336 h) days PH. Ileal (IL) and cecal (CE) epithelial scrapings (mucosal bacteria, M) and digesta (luminal bacteria, L) were collected for microbiota analysis. Microbiota was determined by sequencing the V3-V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA and analyzed using QIIME2. The microbiota of early ileal and cecal samples were characterized by high abundance of unclassified bacteria. Among four bacterial populations (IL-L, IL-M, CE-L, CE-M), IL-M was the least affected by delayed access to feed early PH. Both alpha and beta diversities were affected by delayed access to feed PH in IL-L, CE-M and CE-L. However, the development effect was more pronounced. In all four bacterial populations, significant changes due to developmental effect (time relative to hatch) was observed in taxonomic composition, with transient changes of bacterial taxa during the first two weeks PH. Delayed access to feed has limited influence on bacterial composition with only a few genera and species affected in all four bacterial populations. Predicted function based on 16S rRNA was also affected by delayed access to feed PH with most changes in metabolic pathway richness observed in IL-L, CE-L and CE-M. Conclusions These results show transient changes in chicken microbiota biodiversity during the first two weeks PH and indicate that delayed access to feed affects microbiota development. Proper microbiota development could be an important factor in disease prevention and antibiotic use in broiler chickens. Moreover, significant differences in response to delayed access to feed PH between luminal and mucosal bacterial populations strongly suggests the need for separate analysis of these two populations.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Dietz M.W., Salles J.F., Hsu B.Y., Dijkstra C., Groothuis T.G.G., van der Velde M., Et al., Prenatal Transfer of Gut Bacteria in Rock Pigeon, Microorganisms, 8, 1, (2019)
[2]  
Stanley D., Hughes R.J., Moore R.J., Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 98, 10, pp. 4301-4310, (2014)
[3]  
Zhu X.Y., Zhong T., Pandya Y., Joerger R.D., 16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens, Appl Environ Microbiol, 68, 1, pp. 124-137, (2002)
[4]  
Schokker D., Veninga G., Vastenhouw S.A., Bossers A., de Bree F.M., Kaal-Lansbergen L.M., Et al., Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines, BMC Genomics, 16, (2015)
[5]  
Clavijo V., Florez M.J.V., The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review, Poult Sci, 97, 3, pp. 1006-1021, (2018)
[6]  
Chambers J.R., Gong J., The intestinal microbiota and its modulation for salmonella control in chickens, Food Res Int, 44, 10, pp. 3149-3159, (2011)
[7]  
Pan D., Yu Z., Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet, Gut Microbes, 5, 1, pp. 108-119, (2014)
[8]  
Oakley B.B., Lillehoj H.S., Kogut M.H., Kim W.K., Maurer J.J., Pedroso A., Et al., The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome, FEMS Microbiol Lett, 360, 2, pp. 100-112, (2014)
[9]  
Dibner J.J., Richards J.D., Knight C.D., Microbial imprinting in gut development and health, J Appl Poult Res, 17, pp. 174-188, (2008)
[10]  
Richards-Rios P., Leeming G., Fothergill J., Bernardeau M., Wigley P., Topical Application of Adult Cecal Contents to Eggs Transplants Spore-Forming Microbiota but Not Other Members of the Microbiota to Chicks, Appl Environ Microbiol, 86, 5, (2020)