Process Management Self-Efficacy: Scale Development and Validation

被引:2
作者
Jawahar, I. M. [1 ]
Mohammed, Zach J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Management & Quantitat Methods, Normal, IL 61790 USA
[2] Univ High Sch, Normal, IL 61790 USA
关键词
Self-efficacy; Task performance; Contextual performance; Process management; Scale development; Scale validation; ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH; JOB-SATISFACTION; WORK ENGAGEMENT; POLITICAL SKILL; MANAGERIAL WORK; PERFORMANCE; TASK; COORDINATION; LEADERSHIP; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-021-09749-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Managers, responsible for the work of others, are crucial for organizational success. A key function of managers is coordination and management of process(es) to ensure task completion (Bounty & Drucker-Godard in Human Relations, 72(3), 565-587, 2019; Mintzberg, 2009). Self-efficacy beliefs related to process management are likely to predict how well an individual manages processes. Thus, process management self-efficacy beliefs are crucial to managerial performance and, consequently, to organizational success. The lack of a scale to measure process management self-efficacy is a significant oversight, which this study attempts to remedy. In study 1, using data from four separate samples, we developed a process management self-efficacy scale (PMSES). To provide preliminary evidence of construct validity, we conducted studies 2 and 3. Using data collected from managers, their supervisors, and co-workers, results of study 2 indicated that managers' process management self-efficacy was related to task performance evaluated by their superiors and to contextual performance rated by their co-workers. In addition, process management self-efficacy predicted additional variance in task and contextual performance, beyond a measure of generalized self-efficacy. In study 3, managers' process management self-efficacy beliefs were related to their subordinates' performance. We discuss implications for theory, research, and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 352
页数:14
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical investigation [J].
Ahire, SL ;
Dreyfus, P .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2000, 18 (05) :549-575
[2]   A leadership self-efficacy taxonomy and its relation to effective leadership [J].
Anderson, David W. ;
Krajewski, Henryk T. ;
Goffin, Richard D. ;
Jackson, Douglas N. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2008, 19 (05) :595-608
[3]   PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF MEASURES IN A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS WITH A PRETEST ASSESSMENT OF THEIR SUBSTANTIVE VALIDITIES [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (05) :732-740
[4]  
[Anonymous], The Approach of Managers Regarding Innovative Work
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, C ASS WOM PSYCH BETH
[6]  
Antonakis John., 2017, NATURE LEADERSHIP
[7]   Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 62 (01) :25-33
[8]  
Bakker A. B., 2007, Journal of Managerial Psychology, V22, P309, DOI [10.1108/02683940710733115.62, DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[9]   Major Life Events in Family Life, Work Engagement, and Performance: A Test of the Work-Home Resources Model [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Du, Danyang ;
Derks, Daantje .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (03) :238-249
[10]   Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Bal, P. Matthijs .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (01) :189-206