Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review

被引:105
作者
Weng, Chunhua [1 ]
Tu, Samson W. [2 ]
Sim, Ida [3 ]
Richesson, Rachel [4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Biomed Informat Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
Knowledge representation; Clinical research; Clinical decision support systems; Electronic health records; Eligibility criteria; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; SUPPORT; SYSTEM; PROFORMA; LANGUAGE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Standards-based, computable knowledge representations for eligibility criteria are increasingly needed to provide computer-based decision support for automated research participant screening, clinical evidence application, and clinical research knowledge management. We surveyed the literature and identified five aspects of eligibility criteria knowledge representation that contribute to the various research and clinical applications: the intended use of computable eligibility criteria, the classification of eligibility criteria, the expression language for representing eligibility rules, the encoding of eligibility concepts, and the modeling of patient data. We consider three of these aspects (expression language, codification of eligibility concepts, and patient data modeling) to be essential constructs of a formal knowledge representation for eligibility criteria. The requirements for each of the three knowledge constructs vary for different use cases, which therefore should inform the development and choice of the constructs toward cost-effective knowledge representation efforts. We discuss the implications of our findings for standardization efforts toward knowledge representation for sharable and computable eligibility criteria. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 467
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
AHN I, 1995, HLTH TELEMATICS CLIN, P3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CURRENT PROCEDURAL T
[3]  
Baader F, 2003, DESCRIPTION LOGIC HANDBOOK: THEORY, IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATIONS, P219
[4]   GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines [J].
Boxwala, AA ;
Peleg, M ;
Tu, S ;
Ogunyemi, O ;
Zeng, QT ;
Wang, DW ;
Patel, VL ;
Greenes, RA ;
Shortliffe, EH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2004, 37 (03) :147-161
[5]  
Butte AJ, 2000, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P111
[6]  
CARLSON R, 1995, HIV AIDS CLIN TRIAL
[7]  
Carter JS, 2002, AMIA 2002 SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, P116
[8]  
Chamberlin DD, 1974, P 1974 ACM SIGFIDET, P249, DOI [DOI 10.1145/800296.811515, 10.1145/800296.811515]
[9]  
*CHI, 2006, STAND AD REC FUNCT D
[10]  
CHUTE C, 2005, MED INFORM KNOWLEDGE