Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness

被引:152
作者
Durham, CC
Knight, D
Locke, EA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Maryland Business Sch, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Pepperdine Univ, Malibu, CA 90265 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1997.2739
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Concepts from the domains of leadership theory, goal setting theory and social cognitive theory were used to identify factors influencing team effectiveness, Seventy-two three-person teams performed a computerized tank battle simulation (BOLO) in a 2 x 2 design, Teams were assigned difficult or easy goals and were led by commanders or team coordinators. Commanders were preselected based on personality, Both types of leaders were instructed in their roles, Gender ratios of the teams were balanced, Controlling for ability, teams with team coordinators implemented better tactics than teams with commanders, and the quality of the tactics discovered and implemented by the teams strongly affected team performance, Assigned goal difficulty affected both team efficacy and team-set goal difficulty. Team efficacy influenced team-set goal difficulty which in conjunction with team tactics influenced performance, Team tactics were more strongly related to team performance than was team-set goal difficulty Additionally, an interaction effect on performance was found between team tactics and team-set goal difficulty. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 231
页数:29
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness [J].
Guzzo, RA ;
Dickson, MW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 47 :307-338
[22]  
Joreskog K., 1996, LISREL VII: A Guide to the Program and Application
[23]   Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes [J].
Kirkpatrick, SA ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (01) :36-51
[24]   RESOLVING SCIENTIFIC DISPUTES BY THE JOINT DESIGN OF CRUCIAL EXPERIMENTS BY THE ANTAGONISTS - APPLICATION TO THE EREZ-LATHAM DISPUTE REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN GOAL SETTING [J].
LATHAM, GP ;
EREZ, M ;
LOCKE, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (04) :753-772
[25]   COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL EFFECTS OF PARTICIPATION - A MEDIATOR STUDY [J].
LATHAM, GP ;
WINTERS, DC ;
LOCKE, EA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1994, 15 (01) :49-63
[26]   POWER RELINQUISHMENT VERSUS POWER SHARING - THEORETICAL CLARIFICATION AND EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF DELEGATION AND PARTICIPATION [J].
LEANA, CR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (02) :228-233
[27]   FACT AND FICTION IN ANALYZING RESEARCH ON PARTICIPATIVE DECISION-MAKING - A CRITIQUE OF COTTON, VOLLRATH, FROGGATT, LENGNICK-HALL, AND JENNINGS [J].
LEANA, CR ;
LOCKE, EA ;
SCHWEIGER, DM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1990, 15 (01) :137-146
[28]   Explaining the assigned goal-incentive interaction: The role of self-efficacy and personal goals [J].
Lee, TW ;
Locke, EA ;
Phan, SH .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (04) :541-559
[29]  
Locke E.A., 1991, The essence of leadership: The four keys to leading successfully
[30]  
Locke E.A., 1979, Research in organizational behavior, V1, P265