Can Transitional Justice Improve the Quality of Representation in New Democracies?

被引:18
作者
Ang, Milena [1 ]
Nalepa, Monika [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Soc Fellows, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Polit Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
blackmail; Global Transitional Justice Dataset; quality of representation; transitional justice; WITCH-HUNT; LUSTRATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; POLITICS; LEGACIES; MEMORY; TRUTH; STATE; RULE;
D O I
10.1017/S0043887119000066
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Can transitional justice enhance democratic representation in countries recovering from authoritarian rule? The authors argue that lustration, a policy that reveals secret collaboration with the authoritarian regime, can prevent former authoritarian elites from extorting policy concessions from past collaborators who have been elected as politicians in the new regime. Absent lustration, former elites can threaten to reveal information about past collaboration unless the politicians implement policies these elites desire. In this way, lustration policies enable politicians to avoid blackmail and to be responsive to their constituents, improving the quality of representation. The authors show that whether lustration enhances representation depends on its severity and the extent to which dissidents-turned-politicians would suffer if the skeletons in their closets were revealed. The authors also find that the potential to blackmail politicians increases as the ideological distance between authoritarian elites and politicians decreases. They test this theory with original data from the Global Transitional Justice Dataset, which spans eighty-four countries that transitioned to democracy since 1946.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 666
页数:36
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Albertus Michael., 2014, CONSTITUTIONS AUTHOR
[2]  
Ang Milena, 2019, HARVARD DATAVERSE, V1, DOI [10.7910/DVN/XC4E1I, DOI 10.7910/DVN/XC4E1I]
[3]  
Ang Milena, 2019, MAT CAN TRANSITION S, DOI [10.1017/S0043887119000066, DOI 10.1017/S0043887119000066]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, RETHINKING PARTY SYS, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781503616776
[6]  
Bates Genevieve, 2019, PERSPECTIVES POLITIC, DOI [10.1017/S153759000756, DOI 10.1017/S153759000756]
[7]   Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas [J].
Carey, JM ;
Shugart, MS .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 1995, 14 (04) :417-439
[8]   When Does the Personal Vote Matter for Party Loyalty? The Conditional Effects of Candidate-Centred Electoral Systems [J].
Carroll, Royce ;
Nalepa, Monika .
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 2021, 74 (01) :102-120
[9]  
Carroll Royce, J THEORETICAL POLITI
[10]   Democracy and dictatorship revisited [J].
Cheibub, Jose Antonio ;
Gandhi, Jennifer ;
Vreeland, James Raymond .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2010, 143 (1-2) :67-101