Additional data from clinical examination on site significantly but marginally improve predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score for major complications during Helicopter Emergency Medical Service missions

被引:1
作者
Galazkowski, Robert [1 ]
Farkowski, Michal M. [2 ]
Rabczenko, Daniel [3 ]
Marciniak-Emmons, Marta [2 ]
Darocha, Tomasz [4 ,5 ]
Timler, Dariusz [6 ]
Sterlinski, Maciej [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Emergency Med Serv, 81 A Zwirki & Wigury St, PL-02091 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Inst Cardiol, Dept Coronary Artery Dis 2, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Natl Inst Hyg, Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Monitoring & Anal Populat Hlth Status, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Jagiellonian Univ, Med Coll, John Paul II Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Krakow, Poland
[5] Polish Med Air Rescue, Krakow, Poland
[6] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Emergency Med & Disaster Med, Lodz, Poland
关键词
Helicopter Emergency Medical Service; Revised Trauma Score; risk; major complications; general population; SEVERITY SCORE; SCALE; VALIDATION; TRANSPORT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; COMA; HEMS;
D O I
10.5114/aoms.2016.61884
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Revised Trauma Score (RTS) accurately identifies trauma patients at high risk of adverse events or death. Less is known about its usefulness in the general population and non-trauma recipients of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS). The RTS is a simple tool and omits a lot of other data obtained during clinical evaluation. The aim was to assess the role of the RTS to identify patients at risk of major complications (death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, intubation) in the general population of HEMS patients. Clinical factors beyond the RTS were analyzed to identify additional prognostic factors for predicting major complications. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records of adult patients routinely collected during HEMS missions in the years 2011-2014 was performed. Results: The analysis included 19 554 HEMS missions. Patients were 55 +/- 20 years old and 68% were male. The most common indication for HEMS was diseases of the circulatory system -41%. Major complications occurred in 2072 (10.6%) cases. In the general population of HEMS patients, the RTS accurately identified individuals at risk of major complications at a cut-off value of 10.5 and area under the curve (AUC) of 93.5%. In multivariate analysis, additional clinical data derived from clinical examination (ECG; skin, pupil and breathing examination) significantly but marginally improved the accuracy of RTS assessment: AUC 95.6% (p < 0.001 for the difference). Conclusions: The Revised Trauma Score accurately identifies individuals at risk of major complications during HEMS missions regardless of the indication. Additional clinical data significantly but marginally improved the accuracy of RTS in the general population of HEMS patients.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 870
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE FAILURE OF PREHOSPITAL TRAUMA PREDICTION RULES TO CLASSIFY TRAUMA PATIENTS ACCURATELY [J].
BAXT, WG ;
BERRY, CC ;
EPPERSON, MD ;
SCALZITTI, V .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1989, 18 (01) :1-8
[2]  
Blomstrom-Lundqvist Carina, 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V42, P1493, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.013
[3]   Trauma score systems: Cologne validation study [J].
Bouillon, B ;
Lefering, R ;
Vorweg, M ;
Tiling, T ;
Neugebauer, E ;
Troidl, H .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (04) :652-658
[4]   Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? A systematic review of the evidence [J].
Butler, Daniel P. ;
Anwar, Imran ;
Willett, Keith .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (09) :692-701
[5]   TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
CARNAZZO, AJ ;
COPES, W ;
FOUTY, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1981, 9 (09) :672-676
[6]   A REVISION OF THE TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
COPES, WS ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, TA ;
FLANAGAN, ME .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (05) :623-629
[7]  
Di Bartolomeo Stefano, 2005, Prehosp Emerg Care, V9, P79
[8]   A COMPARISON OF EMT JUDGMENT AND PREHOSPITAL TRAUMA TRIAGE INSTRUMENTS [J].
EMERMAN, CL ;
SHADE, B ;
KUBINCANEK, J .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1991, 31 (10) :1369-1375
[9]   Is the revised trauma score still useful? [J].
Gabbe, BJ ;
Cameron, PA ;
Finch, CF .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 73 (11) :944-948
[10]   Validation of trauma and injury severity score in blunt trauma patients by using a Canadian Trauma Registry [J].
Garber, BG ;
Hebert, PC ;
Wells, G ;
Yelle, JD .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 40 (05) :733-737