Assessment of low-scaling approximations to the equation of motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles equations

被引:52
作者
Goings, Joshua J. [1 ]
Caricato, Marco [2 ]
Frisch, Michael J. [3 ]
Li, Xiaosong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Chem, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Chem, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Gaussian Inc, Wallingford, CT 06492 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ELECTRONIC-TRANSITION ENERGIES; DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY; EXCITED-STATES; LINEAR-RESPONSE; WAVE-FUNCTION; FORMALDEHYDE; VALENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1063/1.4898709
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Methods for fast and reliable computation of electronic excitation energies are in short supply, and little is known about their systematic performance. This work reports a comparison of several low-scaling approximations to the equation of motion coupled cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) and linear-response coupled cluster singles and doubles (LR-CCSD) equations with other single reference methods for computing the vertical electronic transition energies of 11 small organic molecules. The methods, including second order equation-of-motion many-body perturbation theory (EOM-MBPT2) and its partitioned variant, are compared to several valence and Rydberg singlet states. We find that the EOM-MBPT2 method was rarely more than a tenth of an eV from EOM-CCSD calculated energies, yet demonstrates a performance gain of nearly 30%. The partitioned equation-of-motion approach, P-EOM-MBPT2, which is an order of magnitude faster than EOM-CCSD, outperforms the CIS(D) and CC2 in the description of Rydberg states. CC2, on the other hand, excels at describing valence states where P-EOM-MBPT2 does not. The difference between the CC2 and P-EOM-MBPT2 can ultimately be traced back to how each method approximates EOM-CCSD and LR-CCSD. The results suggest that CC2 and P-EOM-MBPT2 are complementary: CC2 is best suited for the description of valence states while P-EOM-MBPT2 proves to be a superior O(N-5) method for the description of Rydberg states. (c) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MANY BODY METHODS CH
[2]   Oscillator Strength: How Does TDDFT Compare to EOM-CCSD? [J].
Caricato, Marco ;
Trucks, Gary W. ;
Frisch, Michael J. ;
Wiberg, Kenneth B. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2011, 7 (02) :456-466
[3]   A Comparison of Three Variants of the Generalized Davidson Algorithm for the Partial Diagonalization of Large Non-Hermitian Matrices [J].
Caricato, Marco ;
Trucks, Gary W. ;
Frisch, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2010, 6 (07) :1966-1970
[4]   Electronic Transition Energies: A Study of the Performance of a Large Range of Single Reference Density Functional and Wave Function Methods on Valence and Rydberg States Compared to Experiment [J].
Caricato, Marco ;
Trucks, Gary W. ;
Frisch, Michael J. ;
Wiberg, Kenneth B. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2010, 6 (02) :370-383
[5]   On the difference between the transition properties calculated with linear response- and equation of motion-CCSD approaches [J].
Caricato, Marco ;
Trucks, Gary W. ;
Frisch, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 131 (17)
[6]  
Casida MarkE., 1995, Time-dependent Density Functional Response Theory For Molecules, V1
[7]   Propagator corrections to adiabatic time-dependent density-functional theory linear response theory [J].
Casida, ME .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 122 (05)
[8]   THE 2ND-ORDER APPROXIMATE COUPLED-CLUSTER SINGLES AND DOUBLES MODEL CC2 [J].
CHRISTIANSEN, O ;
KOCH, H ;
JORGENSEN, P .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1995, 243 (5-6) :409-418
[9]   THE EQUATION-OF-MOTION COUPLED-CLUSTER METHOD - APPLICATIONS TO OPEN-SHELL AND CLOSED-SHELL REFERENCE STATES [J].
COMEAU, DC ;
BARTLETT, RJ .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1993, 207 (4-6) :414-423
[10]   An introduction to coupled cluster theory for computational chemists [J].
Crawford, TD ;
Schaefer, HF .
REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 14, 2000, 14 :33-136