Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study

被引:44
作者
Liu, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Dakui [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Sanjun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qingguo [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xinxiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Colorectal Surg, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
circumferential resection margin; prognostic; rectal cancer; SEER; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; INVOLVEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.1662
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to investigate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a prognostic factor for long-term oncologic survival after rectal cancer surgery. Methods: Patients diagnosed with malignant rectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were identified for this study. The patients were divided into five CRM groups to compare the baseline characteristics and assess cancer-specific survival (CSS): 0-1 mm, 1.1-2.0 mm, 2.1-5.0 mm, 5.1-10.0 mm, and >10 mm. The main endpoint was CSS. Results: Circumferential resection margin <= 1 mm was independently associated with 99% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality in rectal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.990, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.613-2.454, P < 0.001, using CRM (1.1-2.0 mm) as a reference]. CRM (5.1-10.0 mm) was independently associated with 29.2% decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality [HR = 0.708, 95% CI = 0.5250-0.954, P = 0.152, using group (2.1-5.0 mm) as reference]. CRM <= 2 mm or <= 0.4 mm was not obviously associated with CSS. Conclusions: circumferential resection margin is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Surgeons should try to maximize the CRM. Rectal cancer patients with CRM <= 1 mm should receive more postoperative attention depending on individual situation. Also, CRM should be accurately measured in millimeters in a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or pathological report, rather than simply described as "involved" or "clear."
引用
收藏
页码:3673 / 3681
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The prognostic value of combining the CD8+lymphocyte density and the circulating lymphocyte ratio in circumferential resection margin biopsy in rectal cancer [J].
Wu, Bo ;
Zhao, Shengchao ;
Sheng, Yaru ;
Ren, Lu ;
Song, Guoquan .
MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (34)
[42]   The minimum distal resection margin in rectal cancer surgery and its impact on local recurrence - A retrospective cohort analysis [J].
Manegold, Philipp ;
Taukert, Johannes ;
Neeff, Hannes ;
Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan ;
Thomusch, Oliver .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 69 :77-83
[43]   Predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement in surgically resected rectal cancer: A retrospective review of 23,464 patients in the US National Cancer Database [J].
Al-Sukhni, Eisar ;
Attwood, Kristopher ;
Gabriel, Emmanuel ;
Nurkin, Steven J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 28 :112-117
[44]   Clinical implication of negative conversion of predicted circumferential resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer [J].
Lee, Nam Kwon ;
Kim, Chul Yong ;
Park, Young Je ;
Yang, Dae Sik ;
Yoon, Won Sup ;
Kim, Seon Hahn ;
Kim, Jin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) :245-249
[45]   Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection [J].
Simpson, G. S. ;
Eardley, N. ;
McNicol, F. ;
Healey, P. ;
Hughes, M. ;
Rooney, P. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (05) :585-590
[46]   Feasibility of the semi-opened method of specimen resection for a circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter study [J].
Ichiro Takemasa ;
Koichi Okuya ;
Kenji Okita ;
Masayuki Ishii ;
Masaaki Ito ;
Kay Uehara ;
Tsuyoshi Konishi ;
Shigeki Yamaguchi ;
Masafumi Inomata ;
Shintaro Sugita ;
Tadashi Hasegawa ;
Atsushi Ochiai ;
Yoshiharu Sakai ;
Masahiko Watanabe .
Surgery Today, 2022, 52 :1275-1283
[47]   Anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection: treatment and impact on stoma presence 1 year after surgery-a population-based study [J].
Eriksen, Jacob Damgaard ;
Emmertsen, Katrine Jossing ;
Madsen, Anders Husted ;
Iversen, Lene Hjerrild .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (05) :1161-1172
[48]   Reduced Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit [J].
Gietelink, Lieke ;
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. ;
Tanis, Pieter J. ;
Deken, Marion M. ;
ten Berge, Martijn G. ;
Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. ;
van Krieken, J. Han ;
de Noo, Mirre E. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (09) :1111-1119
[49]   Management of the positive pathologic circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: A national cancer database (NCDB) study [J].
de Paul, Thais Reif ;
Augestad, Knut Magne ;
Kiran, Ravi P. ;
Keller, Deborah S. .
EJSO, 2021, 47 (02) :296-303
[50]   Life with a stoma after curative resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study [J].
Feddern, M. -L. ;
Emmertsen, K. J. ;
Laurberg, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (11) :1011-1017