Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study

被引:42
作者
Liu, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Dakui [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Sanjun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qingguo [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xinxiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Colorectal Surg, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2018年 / 7卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
circumferential resection margin; prognostic; rectal cancer; SEER; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; INVOLVEMENT; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.1662
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study aimed to investigate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a prognostic factor for long-term oncologic survival after rectal cancer surgery. Methods: Patients diagnosed with malignant rectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were identified for this study. The patients were divided into five CRM groups to compare the baseline characteristics and assess cancer-specific survival (CSS): 0-1 mm, 1.1-2.0 mm, 2.1-5.0 mm, 5.1-10.0 mm, and >10 mm. The main endpoint was CSS. Results: Circumferential resection margin <= 1 mm was independently associated with 99% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality in rectal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.990, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.613-2.454, P < 0.001, using CRM (1.1-2.0 mm) as a reference]. CRM (5.1-10.0 mm) was independently associated with 29.2% decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality [HR = 0.708, 95% CI = 0.5250-0.954, P = 0.152, using group (2.1-5.0 mm) as reference]. CRM <= 2 mm or <= 0.4 mm was not obviously associated with CSS. Conclusions: circumferential resection margin is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Surgeons should try to maximize the CRM. Rectal cancer patients with CRM <= 1 mm should receive more postoperative attention depending on individual situation. Also, CRM should be accurately measured in millimeters in a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or pathological report, rather than simply described as "involved" or "clear."
引用
收藏
页码:3673 / 3681
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Raftopoulos, I.
    Reed, J. F., III
    Bergamaschi, R.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [22] Feasibility of the semi-opened method of specimen resection for a circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter study
    Takemasa, Ichiro
    Okuya, Koichi
    Okita, Kenji
    Ishii, Masayuki
    Ito, Masaaki
    Uehara, Kay
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    Inomata, Masafumi
    Sugita, Shintaro
    Hasegawa, Tadashi
    Ochiai, Atsushi
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2022, 52 (09) : 1275 - 1283
  • [23] Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Mi Ri Hwang
    Ji Won Park
    Sohee Park
    Hyekyoung Yoon
    Dae Yong Kim
    Hee Jin Chang
    Sun Young Kim
    Sung Chan Park
    Hyo Seong Choi
    Jae Hwan Oh
    Seung-Yong Jeong
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1345 - 1351
  • [24] Circumferential Resection Margin After Laparoscopic and Open Rectal Resection: A Nationwide Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study
    Klein, Mads F.
    Vogelsang, Rasmus P.
    Gogenur, Ismail
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (10) : 1177 - 1185
  • [25] Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer
    Cun Wang
    Zong-guang Zhou
    Yong-yang Yu
    Ye Shu
    Yuan Li
    Lie Yang
    Li Li
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 385 - 390
  • [26] Risk Factors for Recurrence After Surgery for Rectal Cancer in a Modern, Nationwide Population-Based Cohort
    Doroudian, Sepehr
    Osterman, Erik
    Glimelius, Bengt
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (09) : 5570 - 5584
  • [27] A Distal Resection Margin of ≤1 mm and Rectal Cancer Recurrence After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery: The Role of a Positive Distal Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Zeng, Wei-gen
    Liu, Meng-jia
    Zhou, Zhi-xiang
    Wang, Zhen-jun
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (11) : 1175 - 1183
  • [28] The percentage of mesorectal infiltration as a prognostic factor after curative surgery for pT3 rectal cancer
    Sancho-Muriel, Jorge
    Giner, Francisco
    Cholewa, Hanna
    Garcia-Granero, Alvaro
    Rosello, Susana
    Flor-Lorente, Blas
    Cervantes, Andres
    Garcia-Granero, Eduardo
    Frasson, Matteo
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (06) : 1135 - 1143
  • [29] Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Shroder, Megan
    Ford, Molly M.
    Ye, Fei
    Zhiguo, Zhao
    Khan, Aimal
    Mcchesney, Shannon
    Hopkins, Benjamin
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 296 : 532 - 540
  • [30] Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma?
    HosseinaliKhani, M.
    Smedh, K.
    Kraaz, W.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (08) : 706 - 712