Big-science organizations as lead users: A case study of CERN

被引:2
作者
Andersen, Poul H. [1 ]
Aberg, Susanne [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Fibigerstr 11, DK-9100 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Big science; CERN; innovation; interaction; lead user; technology transfer; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION; CREATION; NETWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1177/1024529417724025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the role of big-science organizations in a lead-user context. Lead users are valuable for suppliers because they are active in co-developing products and foreshadowing market needs. Big-science organizations represent a special breed of co-developers, as their demands are not necessarily the avant-garde of a coming market. Yet, they may provide a valuable test bed for suppliers because they are pushing the boundaries of technological capacities and, thus, challenging suppliers' talents. They are also prestigious collaboration partners that help producers to be acknowledged as being at the forefront of technology. They are often deeply engaged in their suppliers' manufacturing and development activities, which is seen as a characteristic of the customer-active paradigm upon which the lead-user notion builds. This paper investigates whether and how interacting with the European Organization for Nuclear Research concerning their development needs may contribute to suppliers' innovation. We ask the question: What characterizes interactions with big-science organizations as a type of lead user, and how do these characteristics impact the potential innovation benefits accruing to the suppliers?
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 363
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Knowledge and innovation of organizational transformation processes: the case study of banking organizations in Colombia
    Murillo Vargas, Guillermo
    ESTUDIOS GERENCIALES, 2009, 25 (112) : 71 - 100
  • [42] Challenges facing translational research organizations in China: a qualitative multiple case study
    Zhou, Laixin
    Li, Ying
    Bosworth, Hayden B.
    Ehiri, John
    Luo, Changkun
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2013, 11
  • [43] Exploration of Science and Technology Interaction: A Case Study on Taxol
    Suominen, Arho
    Ranaei, Samira
    Dedehayir, Ozgur
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 68 (06) : 1786 - 1801
  • [44] Are science parks and incubators good "brand names'' for spin-offs? The case study of Turin
    Salvador, Elisa
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2011, 36 (02) : 203 - 232
  • [45] Influence of green creativity on organizations: A case study from the perspectives of leaders and subordinates
    Henriques, Paulo Lopes
    Jeronimo, Helena Mateus
    Laranjeira, Jessica
    CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 32 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [46] The Life Science Exchange: a case study of a sectoral and sub-sectoral knowledge exchange programme
    Brian Lee Perkins
    Rob Garlick
    Jodie Wren
    Jon Smart
    Julie Kennedy
    Phil Stephens
    Gwyn Tudor
    Jonathan Bisson
    David V. Ford
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 14
  • [47] BIG DATA AS INNOVATION SOURCE IN MUSEUMS: the case study of The British Museum
    de Vasconcellos Motta, Fernanda Miranda
    Barbosa, Catia Rodrigues
    Barbosa, Ricardo Rodrigues
    INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, 2019, 29 (01) : 83 - 100
  • [48] A Framework for Big Data Governance to Advance RHINs: A Case Study of China
    Li, Quan
    Lan, Lan
    Zeng, Nianyin
    You, Lei
    Yin, Jin
    Zhou, Xiaobo
    Meng, Qun
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 50330 - 50338
  • [49] The Competitiveness Poles as a Source of Organisational Learning: Case Study of an Innovative Walloon Project in the Life Science
    Stephanie, Gribomont
    Emilie, Vandenborne
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 2806 - 2810
  • [50] The Life Science Exchange: a case study of a sectoral and sub-sectoral knowledge exchange programme
    Perkins, Brian Lee
    Garlick, Rob
    Wren, Jodie
    Smart, Jon
    Kennedy, Julie
    Stephens, Phil
    Tudor, Gwyn
    Bisson, Jonathan
    Ford, David V.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14