Quantitative assessment of collision risk influence factors in the Tianjin port

被引:66
作者
Zhang, Jinfen [1 ]
Teixeira, Angelo P. [1 ]
Guedes Soares, C. [1 ]
Yan, Xinping [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Ctr Marine Technol & Ocean Engn CENTEC, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, WTS Ctr, Natl Engn Res Ctr Water Transport Safety, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ship collision; Risk assessment; Bayesian rule; Least squares estimation; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL-FACTORS; YANGTZE-RIVER; ACCIDENTS; MODEL; METHODOLOGY; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Collision between ships is one of the dominant types of accident in the approaches to Tianjin port, which accounts for 65% of all types of accidents. This paper presents a quantitative maritime risk assessment methodology by using Bayesian rules and least squares estimation method to identify the dominant factors that contribute to collision accidents. The approach relates accident data with traffic data by pairwise comparisons between the collision risks under different navigation conditions and different types of ships. The results indicate that small ships with lengths smaller than 100 m have a collision risk much higher than larger ships. The results also indicate that safety improvement of working ships and oil tankers is one of the most effective ways to reduce the overall collision risk. The collision probability of the ships without a pilot is about 9 times higher than those with a pilot. The analysis also shows that further steps should be undertaken to reduce risk during strong wind conditions to at least the same level of the normal conditions. The results obtained are useful for managers to support their decisions to control collision risk.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 371
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MSCMPEC2CIRC12 IMO
[2]  
Ant ~ao P., 2008, SAFETY RELIABILITY R, VII, P3265, DOI [10.1201/9781482266481-471, DOI 10.1201/9781482266481-471]
[3]  
Antao P, 2003, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, P37
[4]  
Antao P, 2006, INT J AUTOM COMPUT, V3, P107, DOI 10.1007/s11633-006-0107-8
[5]   Causal factors in accidents of high-speed craft and conventional ocean-going vessels [J].
Antao, Pedro ;
Soares, C. Guedes .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (09) :1292-1304
[6]   On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry [J].
Aven, T ;
Vinnem, JE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2005, 90 (01) :15-24
[7]  
Bolt H, 2010, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, P141, DOI 10.1201/b10572-16
[8]   Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Er, I. Deha ;
Ozok, A. Fahri .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (01) :190-198
[9]  
Cho J.K., 2015, American Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol, V12, P229
[10]  
Dabadgaonkar S., 2015, SFIMAR RES REV, V10, P19