Structural analysis and predictive value of the rodent in vivo micronucleus assay results

被引:43
作者
Benigni, Romualdo [1 ]
Bossa, Cecilia [1 ]
Worth, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Ist Super Sanita, Dept Environm & Hlth, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Hlth & Consumer Protect, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
关键词
TOPOISOMERASE-II INHIBITOR; CULTURED HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES; VITRO GENOTOXICITY TESTS; BONE-MARROW; GENETIC TOXICITY; INDUCTION; CARCINOGENICITY; CELLS; CHEMICALS; MUTAGENICITY;
D O I
10.1093/mutage/geq010
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In vivo genotoxicity studies-shortly followed by carcinogenicity-are posing high demand for test-related recourses in terms of animal lives and resources. Among those, the micronucleus test in rodents is the most widely used as a follow-up to positive in vitro mutagenicity results; therefore, the development and extensive use of estimation techniques based on the concept of Structure-Activity Relationships-such as (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships, read-across and grouping of chemicals-might have a huge saving potential for this end point. In this paper, we present a newly derived compilation of Structural Alerts for the rodent in vivo micronucleus assay, thus providing a coarse-grain filter for preliminary screening of potentially in vivo mutagens. The compilation has been implemented as computerized rule of the expert system Toxtree and is freely available: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/qsar/qsar-tools/index.php?c. In addition, analyses on the performance of the micronucleus assay as pre-screening tool for carcinogenesis indicate that this assay is prone to give false-negative predictions and point to the need of improving the in vivo component of the present testing schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 341
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
AMES BN, 1984, CANCER, V53, P2030, DOI DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840515)53:103.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]  
ANDREWS PR, 1984, J MED CHEM, V27, P1684
[4]  
[Anonymous], EUR SCI TECHNICAL RE
[5]  
[Anonymous], EUR SCI TECHNICAL RE
[6]   FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL ALERTS TO POTENTIAL CARCINOGENICITY OR NONCARCINOGENICITY [J].
ASHBY, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1985, 7 (06) :919-921
[7]   Current issues in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis .67. IPCS harmonization of methods for the prediction and quantification of human carcinogenic/mutagenic hazard, and for indicating the probable mechanism of action of carcinogens [J].
Ashby, J ;
Waters, MD ;
Preston, J ;
Adler, ID ;
Douglas, GR ;
Fielder, R ;
Shelby, MD ;
Anderson, D ;
Sofuni, T ;
Gopalan, HNB ;
Becking, G ;
SonichMullin, C .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1996, 352 (1-2) :153-157
[8]   CYTOGENETIC EFFECTS OF PERMETHRIN IN CULTURED HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES [J].
BARRUECO, C ;
HERRERA, A ;
CABALLO, C ;
DELAPENA, E .
MUTAGENESIS, 1992, 7 (06) :433-437
[9]   The integrated use of models for the properties and effects of chemicals by means of a structured workflow [J].
Bassan, Arianna ;
Worth, Andrew P. .
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2008, 27 (01) :6-20
[10]   RELATIONSHIPS AMONG IN-VITRO MUTAGENICITY ASSAYS - QUANTITATIVE VS QUALITATIVE TEST-RESULTS [J].
BENIGNI, R ;
ANDREOLI, C ;
GIULIANI, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 1995, 26 (02) :155-162