Assessment of various energy storage methods for implementation in hot and arid climates

被引:9
作者
AlShafi, Manal [1 ]
Bicer, Yusuf [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ HBKU, Qatar Fdn QF, Coll Sci & Engn CSE, Div Sustainable Dev DSD, Doha, Qatar
关键词
electricity storage; electrochemical; mechanical; renewable energy; thermal; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGIES; INDICATORS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/est2.191
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Global warming plays an increasing role in our world, as the share of renewable energy sources in the overall production of electricity has witnessed exponential growth over the past years. Consumer demands are required to be met at any moment at a feasible price. However, storing energy in hot and arid climate regions is a sensitive matter as it is critical to consider appropriate technologies to implement for avoiding unnecessary causalities caused by extreme temperatures. This study compares 13 different energy storage methods, namely; pumped hydro, compressed air, flywheels, hot water storage, molten salt, hydrogen, ammonia, lithium-ion battery, Zn-air battery, redox flow battery, fuel cells, supercapacitors, and superconducting magnetic storage to be implemented in hot arid regions in terms of water usage, energy density, location dependency, and temperature degradation. A survey was conducted based on prior criteria to compare all 13 energy storage methods. The study concluded that the highest rankings for energy storage techniques are obtained for; Zn-air battery, superconductors, and flywheels with overall rankings of 7.18, 6.73, and 6.61, respectively. In contrast, some of the rankings are very close to each other implying the potential application of several methods in hot climates.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Abu-rayash A., 2017, MECH ENG
[2]   Sustainability assessment of energy systems: A novel integrated model [J].
Abu-Rayash, Azzam ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 :1098-1116
[3]   A comprehensive evaluation of energy storage options for better sustainability [J].
Acar, Canan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (12) :3732-3746
[4]   Identifying and weighting indicators of building energy efficiency assessment in Ghana [J].
Addy, M. N. ;
Adinyira, E. ;
Ayarkwa, J. .
SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 2017, 2017, 134 :161-170
[5]  
Alrikabi Nada Kh M. A., 2014, Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, V2, P61, DOI 10.7763/JOCET.2014.V2.92
[6]  
Amara S., 2009, EXPT STUDY DOMESTIC
[7]   Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process [J].
Ameen, Raed Fawzi Mohammed ;
Mourshed, Monjur .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 :356-366
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TECHN ROADM, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7300
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Technology Roadmap - Hydropower, DOI DOI 10.1007/1-4020-0612-8_961
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS