Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm

被引:139
|
作者
Jonker, Frederik H. W. [1 ]
Trimarchi, Santi [2 ]
Verhagen, Hence J. M. [3 ]
Moll, Frans L. [4 ]
Sumpio, Bauer E. [1 ]
Muhs, Bart E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg & Radiol, Sect Vasc Surg & Intervent Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] IRCCS, Policlin San Donato, Cardiovasc Ctr E Malan, Milan, Italy
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
STENT-GRAFT; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; OPEN SURGERY; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; REPLACEMENT; PLACEMENT; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.103
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (rDTAA) is associated with high mortality rates. Data supporting endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) to reduce mortality compared with open repair are limited to small series. We investigated published reports for contemporary outcomes of open and endovascular repair of rDTAA. Methods: We systematically reviewed all studies describing the outcomes of rDTAA treated with open repair or TEVAR since 1995 using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) databases. Case reports or studies published before 1995 were excluded. All articles were critically appraised for relevance, validity, and availability of data regarding treatment outcomes. All data were systematically pooled, and meta-analyses were performed to investigate 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and paraplegia rates after both types of repair. Results: Original data of 224 patients (70% male) with rDTAA were identified: 143 (64%) were treated with TEVAR and 81 (36%) with open repair. Mean age was 70 +/- 5.6 years. The 30-day mortality was 19% for patients treated with TEVAR for rDTAA compared 33% for patients treated with open repair, which was significant (odds ratio [OR], 2.15, P = .016). The 30-day occurrence rates of myocardial infarction (11.1% vs 3.5%; OR, 3.70, P < .05), stroke (10.2% vs 4.1%; OR, 2.67; P = .117), and paraplegia (5.5% vs 3.1%; OR, 1.83; P = .405) were increased after open repair vs TEVAR, but this failed to reach statistical significance for stroke and paraplegia. Five additional patients in the TEVAR group died of aneurysm-related causes after 30 days, during a median follow-up of 17 +/- 10 months. Follow-up data after open repair were insufficient. The estimated aneurysm-related survival at 3 years after TEVAR was 70.6%. Conclusion: Endovascular repair of rDTAA is associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate compared with open surgical repair. TEVAR was associated with a considerable number of aneurysm-related deaths during follow-up. Vasc Surg 2010;51:1026-32.)
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1032
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Local versus general anesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lei, Jiahao
    Pu, Hongji
    Wu, Zhaoyu
    Huang, Qun
    Yang, Xinrui
    Liu, Guang
    Lu, Xinwu
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 100 (04) : 679 - 686
  • [42] Wrapping of ascending aortic aneurysm with supra-aortic debranching and endovascular repair for aortic arch aneurysm and ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Soares, Alexandre Magno M. N.
    Sa, Michel Pompeu B. O.
    Escorel Neto, Antonio C.
    Cavalcanti, Luiz Rafael P.
    Zhigalov, Konstantin
    Weymann, Alexander
    Ruhparwar, Arjang
    Lima, Ricardo C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (02) : 503 - 506
  • [43] Meta-analysis of percutaneous vs open endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Hajibandeh, S.
    Child, E.
    Antoniou, G. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 18 - 18
  • [44] Outcome After Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A National Multicentre Study
    Hammo, Sari
    Larzon, Thomas
    Hultgren, Rebecka
    Wanhainen, Anders
    Mani, Kevin
    Resch, Timothy
    Falkenberg, Marten
    Forssell, Claes
    Sonesson, Bjorn
    Pirouzram, Artai
    Roos, Hakan
    Hellgren, Tina
    Khan, Shazhad
    Hoijer, Jonas
    Wahlgren, Carl-Magnus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 57 (06) : 788 - 794
  • [45] A meta-analysis of comparative studies of endovascular versus open repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury
    Takagi, Hisato
    Kawai, Norikazu
    Umemoto, Takuya
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (06): : 1392 - U329
  • [46] Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: open surgical repair versus endovascular repair
    Ucles Cabeza, Oscar
    Martinez Lopez, Isaac
    Pla Sanchez, Ferran
    Baturone Blanco, Adriana
    Serrano Hernando, Francisco Javier
    ANGIOLOGIA, 2021, 73 (04): : 173 - 181
  • [47] Spinal cord injury after open and endovascular repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: A meta-analysis
    Brescia, Alexander A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 163 (02): : 601 - +
  • [48] A population-based analysis of endovascular versus open thoracic aortic aneurysm repair
    Orandi, Babak J.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Deeb, G. Michael
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (05) : 1112 - 1116
  • [49] Spinal cord iniury after open and endovascular repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: A meta-analysis
    Gaudino, Mario
    Khan, Faiza M.
    Rahouma, Mohamed
    Naik, Ajita
    Hameed, Irbaz
    Spadaccio, Cristiano
    Robinson, N. Bryce
    Ruan, Yongle
    Demetres, Michelle
    Oakley, Christian T.
    Gambardella, Ivancarmine
    Iannacone, Erin M.
    Lau, Christopher
    Girardi, Leonard N.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 163 (02): : 552 - 564
  • [50] Individual-patient meta-analysis of three randomized trials comparing endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Sweeting, M. J.
    Balm, R.
    Desgranges, P.
    Ulug, P.
    Powell, J. T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (10) : 1229 - 1239