Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm

被引:139
|
作者
Jonker, Frederik H. W. [1 ]
Trimarchi, Santi [2 ]
Verhagen, Hence J. M. [3 ]
Moll, Frans L. [4 ]
Sumpio, Bauer E. [1 ]
Muhs, Bart E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg & Radiol, Sect Vasc Surg & Intervent Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] IRCCS, Policlin San Donato, Cardiovasc Ctr E Malan, Milan, Italy
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
STENT-GRAFT; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; OPEN SURGERY; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; REPLACEMENT; PLACEMENT; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.103
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (rDTAA) is associated with high mortality rates. Data supporting endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) to reduce mortality compared with open repair are limited to small series. We investigated published reports for contemporary outcomes of open and endovascular repair of rDTAA. Methods: We systematically reviewed all studies describing the outcomes of rDTAA treated with open repair or TEVAR since 1995 using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) databases. Case reports or studies published before 1995 were excluded. All articles were critically appraised for relevance, validity, and availability of data regarding treatment outcomes. All data were systematically pooled, and meta-analyses were performed to investigate 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and paraplegia rates after both types of repair. Results: Original data of 224 patients (70% male) with rDTAA were identified: 143 (64%) were treated with TEVAR and 81 (36%) with open repair. Mean age was 70 +/- 5.6 years. The 30-day mortality was 19% for patients treated with TEVAR for rDTAA compared 33% for patients treated with open repair, which was significant (odds ratio [OR], 2.15, P = .016). The 30-day occurrence rates of myocardial infarction (11.1% vs 3.5%; OR, 3.70, P < .05), stroke (10.2% vs 4.1%; OR, 2.67; P = .117), and paraplegia (5.5% vs 3.1%; OR, 1.83; P = .405) were increased after open repair vs TEVAR, but this failed to reach statistical significance for stroke and paraplegia. Five additional patients in the TEVAR group died of aneurysm-related causes after 30 days, during a median follow-up of 17 +/- 10 months. Follow-up data after open repair were insufficient. The estimated aneurysm-related survival at 3 years after TEVAR was 70.6%. Conclusion: Endovascular repair of rDTAA is associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate compared with open surgical repair. TEVAR was associated with a considerable number of aneurysm-related deaths during follow-up. Vasc Surg 2010;51:1026-32.)
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1032
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Harky, Amer
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Wong, Chris Ho Ming
    Bashir, Mohamad
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 54 : 304 - +
  • [2] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Ruptured Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
    Minami, Tomoyuki
    Imoto, Kiyotaka
    Uchida, Keiji
    Karube, Norihisa
    Yasuda, Shota
    Choh, Tomoki
    Suzuki, Shinichi
    Masuda, Munetaka
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2015, 30 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [3] Endovascular versus open repair for descending thoracic aortic rupture: institutional experience and meta-analysis
    Xenos, Eleftherios Sarantis
    Minion, David J.
    Davenport, Daniel L.
    Hamdallah, Omar
    Abedi, Nick N.
    Sorial, Ehab E.
    Endean, Eric D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (02) : 282 - 286
  • [4] Effectiveness of endovascular versus open surgical repair for thoracic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mahboub-Ahari, Alireza
    Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh
    Heidari, Fariba
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (01) : 25 - 36
  • [5] Endovascular Repair versus Open Repair for Isolated Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
    Lee, Hyung Chae
    Joo, Hyun-Chel
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Lee, Sak
    Chang, Byung-Chul
    Yoo, Kyung-Jong
    Youn, Young-Nam
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 904 - 912
  • [6] Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Intact Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
    Chiu, Peter
    Goldstone, Andrew B.
    Schaffer, Justin M.
    Lingala, Bharathi
    Miller, D. Craig
    Mitchell, R. Scott
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    Fischbein, Michael P.
    Dake, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (06) : 643 - 651
  • [7] Current challenges in open versus endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Harky, Amer
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Wong, Chris Ho Ming
    Francis, Chris
    Bashir, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (05) : 1582 - 1592
  • [8] Phase-specific survival after endovascular versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Iyanna, Nidhi
    Ogami, Takuya
    Yokoyama, Yujiro
    Takagi, Hisato
    Serna-Gallegos, Derek
    Chu, Danny
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    Kuno, Toshiki
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 65 (03) : 249 - 255
  • [9] Open Versus Endovascular or Hybrid Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Clare, Ryan
    Jorgensen, Julianne
    Brar, Somjot S.
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2016, 18 (10)
  • [10] Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Cheng, Davy
    Martin, Janet
    Shennib, Hani
    Dunning, Joel
    Muneretto, Claudio
    Schueler, Stephan
    Von Segesser, Ludwig
    Sergeant, Paul
    Turina, Marko
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10) : 986 - 1001