The Economics of Renaissance Art

被引:15
作者
Etro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Fond Ta S Giobbe 873, I-30121 Venice, Italy
关键词
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; MARKET; PAINTINGS; REPUTATION; COMPANIES; INDUSTRY; GUILDS; IMPACT; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1017/S0022050718000244
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I analyzed the market of paintings in Florence and Italy (1285-1550). Hedonic regressions on real prices allowed me to advance evidence that the market was competitive and that an important determinant of artistic innovation was driven by economic incentives. Price differentials reflected quality differentials between painters as perceived at the time (whose proxy is the length of the biography of Vasari) and did not depend on regional destinations, as expected under monopolistic competition with free entry. An inverse-U relation between prices and age of execution is consistent with reputational theories of artistic effort, and prices increased since the 1420s.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 538
页数:39
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Repeated Games and Reputations
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1938, LEBENSRAUM KUNSTLERS
[3]  
Antal Frederick, 1944, FLORENTINE PAINTING
[4]   The decline and fall of the European film industry: sunk costs, market size, and market structure, 1890-1927 [J].
Bakker, G .
ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 2005, 58 (02) :310-351
[5]  
Baumol W. J., 1994, Journal of Cultural Economics, V18, P171, DOI 10.1007/BF01080225
[6]  
Baxandall Michael., 1972, Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy
[7]  
Berenson Bernard., 1952, ITALIAN PAINTERS REN
[8]   MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION WHEN INCOME MATTERS [J].
Bertoletti, Paolo ;
Etro, Federico .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2017, 127 (603) :1217-1243
[9]   Preferences, entry, and market structure [J].
Bertoletti, Paolo ;
Etro, Federico .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 47 (04) :792-821
[10]  
Binaghi Olivari Maria Teresa, 2007, B LUINI