A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships

被引:89
作者
Ward, Melanie [1 ]
Schulz, Amy J. [2 ]
Israel, Barbara A. [3 ]
Rice, Kristina [1 ]
Martenies, Sheena E. [4 ]
Markarian, Evan [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, 28221 SPH 1,1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, 2794 SPH 1,1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Southwest Detroit Environm Vis, 2555 Clarke Ave, Detroit, MI 48209 USA
关键词
Community-based participatory research; Community-engaged research; Community-based research; Participatory research; Evaluation; Framework; Health equity; Health promotion; Equity promotion; Participatory evaluation; Health impact assessment; Health disparities; Social determinants of health; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC-HEALTH; POLICY; DISPARITIES; CAPACITY; DETROIT; SCIENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches present strong opportunities to promote health equity by improving health within low-income communities and communities of color. CBPR principles and evaluation frameworks highlight an emphasis on equitable group dynamics (e.g., shared leadership and power, participatory decision-making, two-way open communication) that promote both equitable processes within partnerships and health equity in the communities with whom they engage. The development of an evaluation framework that describes the manner in which equitable group dynamics promote intermediate and long-term equity outcomes can aid partners in assessing their ability to work together effectively and improve health equity in the broader community. CBPR principles align with health equity evaluation guidelines recently developed for Health Impact Assessments (HIAs), which emphasize meaningful engagement of communities in decision-making processes that influence their health. In this paper, we propose a synergistic framework integrating contributions from CBPR and HIA evaluation frameworks in order to guide efforts to evaluate partnership effectiveness in addressing health inequities. We suggest specific indicators that might be used to assess partnership effectiveness in addressing health equity and discuss implications for evaluation of partnership approaches to address health equity.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COMMUNITY BASED PART
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RES DESIGN QUALITATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, METHODS COMMUNITY BA
[4]  
Becker A. B., 2013, BOOK
[5]  
Bhatia R., 2014, Minimum elements and practice standards for health impact assessments
[6]  
Braveman PA., 2017, What Is Health Equity? And What Difference Does a Definition Make? National Collaborative for Health Equity MBA, Evidence for Action
[7]   A protocol for community based research [J].
Brown, L ;
Vega, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 12 (04) :4-5
[8]   IDEOLOGY AND POLITICAL-ECONOMY IN INQUIRY - ACTION RESEARCH AND PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH [J].
BROWN, LD ;
TANDON, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1983, 19 (03) :277-294
[9]   The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy [J].
Cacari-Stone, Lisa ;
Wallerstein, Nina ;
Garcia, Analilia P. ;
Minkler, Meredith .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (09) :1615-1623
[10]  
Chavez V., 2008, COMMUNITY BASED PART, V2nd, P91