Assessment of tibiofemoral position in total knee arthroplasty using the active flexion lateral radiograph

被引:14
作者
Laidlaw, Michael S. [1 ]
Rolston, Lindsey R. [2 ]
Bozic, Kevin J. [1 ]
Ries, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94103 USA
[2] Henry Cty Ctr Orthopaed Surg & Sports Med, New Castle, IN 47362 USA
关键词
Knee; Osteoarthritis; Arthroplasty; Flexion; Radiograph; KINEMATIC ANALYSIS; POSTERIOR; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2009.07.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study is a retrospective comparative cohort radiographic analysis of 114 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), medial and patellofemoral compartment bicruciate retaining arthroplasty (BCR), or bicruciate substituting (BCS) TKA. In an effort to obtain a quantitative measurement of both anteroposterior (AP) tibiofemoral position and active knee flexion we have routinely taken post-operative lateral radiographs in a position of maximal active flexion. Passive range of motion (PRoM) after TKA was significantly greater than pre-operative passive range of motion for each cohort (p<0.001). When comparing post-operative active range of motion (ARoM) to PRoM, there was a statistically significant difference within the PCR and BCR cohorts (p<0.001 and p<0.005, respectively), while none was detected in the BCS group (p=0.09). The mean rollback of PCR was - 1.2 mm, BCR was -3.3 mm and BCS was -12.0 mm. The mean rollback of all three groups was similar to measurements reported from previous fluoroscopic historical control data. Our findings indicate that tibiofemoral AP translation during knee flexion can be assessed on an active flexion lateral knee radiograph and provide additional information that is not available from a routine lateral radiograph. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 42
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AKIZUKI S, 2008, J ARTHROPLASTY, P1
[2]  
Andriacchi T P, 1986, J Arthroplasty, V1, P211, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(86)80033-X
[3]   In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty [J].
Argenson, JNA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Aubaniac, JM ;
Dennis, DA ;
Northcut, EJ ;
Anderson, DT ;
Agostini, S .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (08) :1049-1054
[4]   Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy [J].
Banks, SA ;
Hodge, WA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 43 (06) :638-649
[5]   Detecting radiographic knee osteoarthritis: what combination of views is optimal? [J].
Chaisson, CE ;
Gale, DR ;
Gale, E ;
Kazis, L ;
Skinner, K ;
Felson, DT .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2000, 39 (11) :1218-1221
[6]  
Dennis DA, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P47
[7]   Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Dennis, DA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Mahfouz, MR ;
Haas, BD ;
Stiehl, JB .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (416) :37-57
[8]   In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements [J].
Dennis, DA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Mahfouz, MR .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (410) :114-130
[9]   Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty - The effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions [J].
Dennis, DA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Stiehl, JB ;
Walker, SA ;
Dennis, KN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (07) :748-752
[10]  
Dennis DA, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P107