Female genital mutilation/cutting, timing of deinfibulation, and risk of cesarean section

被引:12
作者
Taraldsen, Solvi [1 ]
Vangen, Siri [1 ,2 ]
Oian, Pal [3 ]
Sorbye, Ingvil K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Womens Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Hosp North Norway, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tromso, Norway
[4] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
cesarean section; country of birth; deinfibulation; female genital mutilation; cutting; nulliparity; Somalia; timing of deinfibulation; BIRTH OUTCOMES; SOMALI WOMEN; ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS; CARE; IMMIGRANTS; COMPLICATIONS; CIRCUMCISION; ASSOCIATION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14111
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction The impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on obstetric outcomes in high-income countries is not clear. In general, women with female genital mutilation/cutting type 3 (infibulation) seem to be most at risk of adverse outcomes such as cesarean section. Deinfibulation is recommended to prevent obstetric complications. Whether the timing of this procedure affects the complication risk is not known. The aims of this study were, first, to examine the association between female genital mutilation/cutting and the risk of cesarean section in Norway, and, second, whether the timing of deinfibulation affected the cesarean section risk. Material and methods This was a historical cohort study of nulliparous Somali-born women who gave birth in Norway between 1990 and 2014. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway identified the women. Data were collected from medical records at 11 participating birth units. The exposures were female genital mutilation/cutting status and deinfibulation before pregnancy, during pregnancy, or no deinfibulation before labor onset. The main outcome was odds ratio (OR) of cesarean section. Type of cesarean section, primary indications, and neonatal outcomes were secondary outcomes. Results Women with female genital mutilation/cutting type 3 had lower risk of cesarean section compared with women with no female genital mutilation/cutting (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89 P = .02). Among the 1504 included women, the cesarean section rate was 28.0% and the proportion of emergency operations was 92.9%. Fetal distress was the primary indication in approximately 50% of cases, across the groups with different female genital mutilation/cutting status. Women who had no deinfibulation before labor onset had lower risk of cesarean section compared with those who underwent deinfibulation before or during pregnancy (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88 P = .01). Conclusions High risk of cesarean section in Somali nulliparous women was not related to the type of female genital mutilation/cutting in the present study. Deinfibulation before labor did not protect against cesarean section. Our findings indicate that nulliparous Somali women are at high risk of intrapartum complications. Future research should focus on measures to reduce maternal morbidity and on how timing of deinfibulation affects the outcomes of vaginal births.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis [J].
Abdulcadir, J. ;
Rodriguez, M. I. ;
Say, L. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (03) :294-303
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, British Journal of Midwifery, DOI DOI 10.12968/BJOM.2015.23.6.430
[4]   Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation? [J].
Balachandran, Aswini A. ;
Duvalla, Swapna ;
Sultan, Abdul H. ;
Thakar, Ranee .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (03) :339-344
[5]  
Banks E, 2006, LANCET, V367, P1835, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68805-3
[6]   Variations in first-time caesarean birth between Eastern African immigrants and Australian-born women in public care: A population-based investigation in Victoria [J].
Belihu, Fetene B. ;
Small, Rhonda ;
Davey, Mary-Ann .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (03) :294-301
[7]   The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review [J].
Berg, R. C. ;
Taraldsen, S. ;
Said, M. A. ;
Sorbye, I. K. ;
Vangen, S. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (03) :278-287
[8]   An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting [J].
Berg, R. C. ;
Odgaard-Jensen, J. ;
Fretheim, A. ;
Underland, V. ;
Vist, G. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
[9]   Reasons for and Experiences With Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review [J].
Berg, Rigmor C. ;
Taraldsen, Solvi ;
Said, Maryan A. ;
Sorbye, Ingvil Krarup ;
Vangen, Siri .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (08) :977-990
[10]   The Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Berg, Rigmor C. ;
Underland, Vigdis .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013