Life cycle assessment of recycling strategies for perovskite photovoltaic modules

被引:126
作者
Tian, Xueyu [1 ]
Stranks, Samuel D. [2 ,3 ]
You, Fengqi [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Coll Engn, Syst Engn, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cavendish Lab, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, Cambridge, England
[4] Cornell Univ, Robert Frederick Smith Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Cornell Atkinson Ctr Sustainabil, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SOLAR-CELLS; ENERGY PAYBACK; LOW-COST; SUSTAINABILITY; ELECTRODES; EMISSIONS; EFFICIENT; CADMIUM; LAYERS;
D O I
10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective recycling of worn-out perovskite photovoltaic modules could improve their energy and environmental sustainability. The authors perform holistic life cycle assessments of selected solar cell architectures and provide guidelines for their future design. Effective recycling of spent perovskite solar modules will further reduce the energy requirements and environmental consequences of their production and deployment, thus facilitating their sustainable development. Here, through 'cradle-to-grave' life cycle assessments of a variety of perovskite solar cell architectures, we report that substrates with conducting oxides and energy-intensive heating processes are the largest contributors to primary energy consumption, global warming potential and other types of impact. We therefore focus on these materials and processes when expanding to 'cradle-to-cradle' analyses with recycling as the end-of-life scenario. Our results reveal that recycling strategies can lead to a decrease of up to 72.6% in energy payback time and a reduction of 71.2% in greenhouse gas emission factor. The best recycled module architecture can exhibit an extremely small energy payback time of 0.09 years and a greenhouse gas emission factor as low as 13.4 g CO2 equivalent per kWh; it therefore outcompetes all other rivals, including the market-leading silicon at 1.3-2.4 years and 22.1-38.1 g CO2 equivalent per kWh. Finally, we use sensitivity analyses to highlight the importance of prolonging device lifetime and to quantify the effects of uncertainty induced by the still immature manufacturing processes, changing operating conditions and individual differences for each module.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of recycled semiconductor material in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules production - A life cycle assessment of environmental impacts
    Klugmann-Radziemska, Ewa
    Kuczynska-Lazewska, Anna
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2020, 205
  • [22] Producer responsibility and recycling solar photovoltaic modules
    McDonald, N. C.
    Pearce, J. M.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) : 7041 - 7047
  • [23] Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic Panels
    Muteri, Vincenzo
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Curto, Domenico
    Franzitta, Vincenzo
    Longo, Sonia
    Mistretta, Marina
    Parisi, Maria Laura
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [24] Comparison of Perovskite Solar Cells with other Photovoltaics Technologies from the Point of View of Life Cycle Assessment
    Vidal, Rosario
    Alberola-Borras, Jaume-Adria
    Sanchez-Pantoja, Nuria
    Mora-Sero, Ivan
    ADVANCED ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH, 2021, 2 (05):
  • [25] Life-cycle human- and eco-toxicity assessment of emerging lead-based perovskite compared to conventional photovoltaic panels
    Leccisi, Enrica
    Fthenakis, Vasilis
    MRS BULLETIN, 2024, : 1240 - 1250
  • [26] Life cycle impact assessment of photovoltaic power generation from crystalline silicon-based solar modules in Nigeria
    Akinyele, D. O.
    Rayudu, R. K.
    Nair, N. K. C.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 101 : 537 - 549
  • [27] Engineering Perovskite Precursor Inks for Scalable Production of High-Efficiency Perovskite Photovoltaic Modules
    Chung, Jaehoon
    Kim, Seung-Woo
    Li, You
    Mariam, Tamanna
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Rajakaruna, Manoj
    Saeed, Muhammad Mohsin
    Abudulimu, Abasi
    Shin, Seong Sik
    Guye, Kathryn N.
    Huang, Zixu
    Westbrook, Robert J. E.
    Miller, Emily
    Subedi, Biwas
    Podraza, Nikolas J.
    Heben, Michael J.
    Ellingson, Randy J.
    Ginger, David S.
    Song, Zhaoning
    Yan, Yanfa
    ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS, 2023, 13 (22)
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of grid-connected photovoltaic power generation from crystalline silicon solar modules in China
    Hou, Guofu
    Sun, Honghang
    Jiang, Ziying
    Pan, Ziqiang
    Wang, Yibo
    Zhang, Xiaodan
    Zhao, Ying
    Yao, Qiang
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 164 : 882 - 890
  • [29] Metals recycling maps and allocation procedures in life cycle assessment
    Dubreuil, Alain
    Young, Steven B.
    Atherton, John
    Gloria, Thomas P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (06) : 621 - 634
  • [30] Illustrating Anticipatory Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Photovoltaic Technologies
    Wender, Ben A.
    Foley, Rider W.
    Prado-Lopez, Valentina
    Ravikumar, Dwarakanath
    Eisenberg, Daniel A.
    Hottle, Troy A.
    Sadowski, Jathan
    Flanagan, William P.
    Fisher, Angela
    Laurin, Lise
    Bates, Matthew E.
    Linkov, Igor
    Seager, Thomas P.
    Fraser, Matthew P.
    Guston, David H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (18) : 10531 - 10538