Three-Year Outcome of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the MISSION! Intervention Study)

被引:41
|
作者
Atary, Jael Z. [1 ]
van der Hoeven, Bas L. [1 ]
Liem, Su San [1 ]
Jukema, J. Wouter [1 ]
van der Bom, Johanna G. [2 ]
Atsma, Douwe E. [1 ]
Bootsma, Marianne [1 ]
Zeppenfeld, Katja [1 ]
van der Wall, Ernst E. [1 ]
Schalij, Martin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2010年 / 106卷 / 01期
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; UNCOATED STENTS; METAANALYSIS; REDEFINITION; CARDIOLOGY; THERAPY; COLLEGE; BENEFIT; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.02.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) to those of bare-metal stents (BMS) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, outcomes were assessed in 310 patients (mean age age 59 +/- 11 years, 78% men) included in the randomized MISSION! Intervention Study: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction after a median follow-up period of 38 months. All patients were treated with aspirin (lifelong) and clopidogrel for 1 year after stent implantation. Except for a significant difference between reference vessel diameters (SES 2.76 mm vs BMS 2.92 mm, p = 0.02), there were no significant differences in baseline and angiographic characteristics between the treatment groups (158 SES, 152 BMS). A significant difference between SES and BMS patients for all revascularization end points was found after the first year of follow-up. However, at 3 years of follow-up, although there was still a trend toward better clinical outcomes in SES-treated patients, differences were no longer significant (death 4.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.41; target vessel related myocardial infarction 2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.32; target vessel revascularization 8.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.06), target lesion revascularization 6.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.06; and target vessel failure 12.0% vs 19.7%, p = 0.06). Three cases of very late (definite) stent thrombosis were observed in the SES group (1.9%) versus none in the BMS group (p = 0.14). In conclusion, the significant SES benefit (compared to BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions at 1-year follow-up in terms of target vessel revascularizations decreased to some extent because of more similar target vessel revascularization rates during the 2 subsequent years. Rates of death and nonfatal recurrent MI remained comparable. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2010;106:4-12)
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 12
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term comparison of sirolimus-eluting and bare-metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Wijnbergen, Inge
    Tijssen, Jan
    Brueren, Guus
    Peels, Kathinka
    van Dantzig, Jan Melle
    van't Veer, Marcel
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Michels, Rolf
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2014, 25 (05) : 378 - 383
  • [2] Drug Eluting Stents versus Bare Metal Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Kaya, Adnan
    Tatlisu, Mustafa Adem
    KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2019, 11 (01): : 62 - 68
  • [3] Outcomes of drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
    Brito, Joao
    Almeida, Manuel
    Teles, Rui Campante
    Sousa, Pedro
    Abecasis, Joao
    Cale, Rita
    Goncalves, Pedro
    Raposo, Luis
    Mendes, Miguel
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 30 (11) : 813 - 819
  • [4] Drug-Eluting Stent versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Word of Caution
    Gupta, Mohit
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 22 (04): : 159 - 160
  • [5] Paclitaxel- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Analyses for Diabetic and Nondiabetic Subpopulation
    Cho, Youngjin
    Yang, Han-Mo
    Park, Kyung-Woo
    Chung, Woo-Young
    Choi, Dong-Joo
    Seo, Won-Woo
    Jeong, Kyoung-Tae
    Chae, Sung-Chul
    Lee, Myoung-Yong
    Hur, Seung-Ho
    Chae, Jei-Keon
    Seong, In-Whan
    Yoon, Jung-Han
    Oh, Suk-Kyu
    Kim, Doo-Il
    Park, Keum-Soo
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Jang, Yang-Soo
    Bae, Jang-Ho
    Hong, Taeg-Jong
    Cho, Myeong-Chan
    Kim, Young-Jo
    Jeong, Myung-Ho
    Kim, Min-Jung
    Park, Sue K.
    Chae, In-Ho
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (05) : 498 - 506
  • [6] Comparison of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stents for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With or Without Abciximab in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction DEBATER: The Eindhoven Reperfusion Study
    Wijnbergen, Inge
    Helmes, Harold
    Tijssen, Jan
    Brueren, Guus
    Peels, Kathinka
    van Dantzig, Jan Melle
    van't Veer, Marcel
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Michels, Rolf
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (03) : 313 - 322
  • [7] Three-Year Follow-up of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents vs. Bare Metal Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Ejiri, Kentaro
    Ishihara, Masaharu
    Dai, Kazuoki
    Miki, Takashi
    Inoue, Ichiro
    Kawagoe, Takuji
    Shimatani, Yuji
    Miura, Fumiharu
    Nakama, Yasuharu
    Otani, Takayuki
    Ikenaga, Hiroki
    Oda, Nozomu
    Nakamura, Masayuki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [8] Comparison of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting With Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Sabate, Manel
    Raeber, Lorenz
    Heg, Dik
    Brugaletta, Salvatore
    Kelbaek, Henning
    Cequier, Angel
    Ostojic, Miodrag
    Iniguez, Andres
    Tueller, David
    Serra, Antonio
    Baumbach, Andreas
    von Birgelen, Clemens
    Hernandez-Antolin, Rosana
    Roffi, Marco
    Mainar, Vicente
    Valgimigli, Marco
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Jueni, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [9] 10-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Everolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Brugaletta, Salvatore
    Gomez-Lara, Josep
    Ortega-Paz, Luis
    Jimenez-Diaz, Victor
    Jimenez, Marcelo
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Diletti, Roberto
    Mainar, Vicente
    Campo, Gianluca
    Silvestro, Antonio
    Maristany, Jaume
    Flores, Xacobe
    Oyarzabal, Loreto
    De Miguel-Castro, Antonio
    Iniguez, Andres
    Serra, Antonio
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Ielasi, Alfonso
    Tespili, Maurizio
    Lenzen, Mattie
    Gonzalo, Nieves
    Bordes, Pascual
    Tebaldi, Matteo
    Biscaglia, Simone
    Rodriguez-Arias, Juan Jose
    Al-Shaibani, Soheil
    Arevalos, Victor
    Romaguera, Rafael
    Gomez-Hospital, Joan Antoni
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Sabate, Manel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (09) : 1165 - 1178
  • [10] A meta-analysis of randomized trials on clinical outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients
    Pan, Xiao-hong
    Chen, Ying-xue
    Xiang, Mei-xiang
    Xu, Geng
    Wang, Jian-an
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2010, 11 (10): : 754 - 761