Continuous Veno-Venous High Cut-Off Hemodialysis Compared to Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration in Intensive Care Unit Acute Kidney Injury Patients

Aims: High cut-off (HCO) continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was compared to high-flux membrane (HFM) continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in intensive care unit (ICU) acute kidney injury (AKI) in terms of efficiency, hemodynamic tolerance, medium-sized molecules removal, albumin loss, and inflammatory system activation. Methods: In a prospective cross-over randomized study, 10 AKI patients underwent successively HCO (Ultraflux EmiC(2): beta(2)-microglobulin [beta M-2] sieving coefficient [SC]: 0.9) CvvHD and HFM (Ultraflux AV1000S: beta M-2 SC: 0.65) CvvHDF. Results: Over the 20 sessions, hypotensive and febrile episodes, reduction rates of urea, creatinine, and beta M-2 were similar in both modalities. Though dialysis dose was higher with CVVHDF (36 +/- 4vs.21 +/- 6 mL/Kg/h), urea, creatinine, and beta M-2 instantaneous and plasmatic clearances did not differ except for urea at 12 h. Protein loss, superoxide anion production, cytokines, and growth factors variations were also comparable. Conclusion: HCO CVVHD is well tolerated and is as effective as HFM CVVHDF in clearance of solutes and removal of beta M-2. It induces neither protein loss nor overproduction of superoxide anion. Video Journal Club "Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco" at http://www.karger.com/?doi=489082. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.