Efficiency improvement, structural change, and energy intensity reduction: Evidence from Chinese agricultural sector

被引:30
作者
Wu, Shu [1 ]
Ding, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Agricultural energy consumption; Energy intensity; Efficiency improvement; Structural change; Index decomposition analysis; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL-STRUCTURE; INFLUENTIAL FACTORS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; DRIVING FORCES; NATURAL-GAS; DEMAND; INNOVATION; SUBSTITUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105313
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China is now facing the challenge of modernizing its agricultural sector while reducing agricultural energy intensity to slow down the growth of agricultural energy consumption. This paper aims to investigate the determinants of changes in agricultural energy intensity (CAEI) in China. Specifically, this paper first uses the Log-mean Divisia Index method to decompose CAEI into changes in efficiency component (CEC) and changes in structure component (CSC) based on national time-series data during 1981-2017 and then employs panel data models with fixed effects to discern the determinants of CAEI, CEC, and CSC based on provincial data during 1991-2015. The results are as follows: (1) CEC dominates CAEI with a correlation coefficient of 0.9927, while the impact of CSC is limited; (2) an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between CEC and income. Capital and labor significantly improve CEC, while the impact of energy price is significantly negative; (3) a U-shaped relationship is observed between CSC and income. Capital and labor significantly decrease CSC; (4) a U-shaped relationship exists between CAEI and capital. Energy price and income significantly reduce CAEI, while labor has the opposite effect. Finally, it is suggested to improve farmers' environmental awareness, deepen agricultural capital accumulation, and deregulate rural energy prices. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can China's Energy Intensity Constraint Policy Promote Total Factor Energy Efficiency? Evidence from the Industrial Sector
    Shao, Shuai
    Yang, Zhenbing
    Yang, Lill
    Ma, Shuang
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (04) : 101 - 127
  • [22] Driving force analysis of water footprint change based on extended STIRPAT model: Evidence from the Chinese agricultural sector
    Zhao, Chunfu
    Chen, Bin
    Hayat, Tasawar
    Alsaedi, Ahmed
    Ahmad, Bashir
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 47 : 43 - 49
  • [23] A Study of the Impact of Structural Adjustment and Efficiency Improvement on Energy Saving and Emission Reduction
    Chen Mingsheng
    Liu Mimi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT, 2010, : 225 - 231
  • [24] How does energy efficiency affect employment? Evidence from Chinese cities
    Chen, Tianqi
    Zhang, Yi
    Jiang, Cailou
    Li, Hui
    ENERGY, 2023, 280
  • [25] The Dynamics of Structural and Energy Intensity Change
    Cao, Lizhan
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2017, 2017
  • [26] Why did the energy intensity fall in China's industrial sector in the 1990s? The relative importance of structural change and intensity change
    Zhang, ZX
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (06) : 625 - 638
  • [27] Biased technical change, capital deepening, and efficiency of environmental regulations: Evidence from the Chinese provinces
    Zhao, Pan
    Hu, Guoheng
    Jin, Peizhen
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 191
  • [28] Energy Intensity, Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth among OECD Nations from 2000 to 2019
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    Goto, Mika
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (04)
  • [29] Does competition from the informal sector affect firms? energy intensity? Evidence from China
    Zhao, Nan
    Liu, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Zizhe
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 62 : 130 - 142
  • [30] Energy efficiency and energy rebound, intensity, and output effects in transport sector of Pakistan
    Shafqut Ullah
    Tahir Mahmood
    Muhammad Zamir Khan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 75402 - 75416